From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Maneesh Soni <maneesh@in.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Juergen Kreileder <jk@blackdown.de>
Subject: Re: Fw: [Bug 4559] New: cfq scheduler lockup: NMI oops while runningltp - 20050207 on 2.6.12-rc2-mm3 with kdump enabled
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 16:42:34 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42737D3A.ABEF2022@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050429000038.1da6f2e1.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4559
>
> Timer bug, I guess.
Yes, the new timer code is racy. Example:
spinlock_t LOCK;
void void timer_func()
{
spin_lock(&LOCK);
}
timer_list TIMER = TIMER_INITIALIZER(timer_func);
-------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU_0 CPU_1
add_timer(&TIMER);
spin_lock(&LOCK);
__run_timers:
sets ->running_timer = &TIMER;
calls timer_func()
waits for &LOCK
__mod_timer(&TIMER);
/* Ensure the timer is serialized. */
retries while ->running_timer == &TIMER
Many thanks to Maneesh Soni for his excellent analysis in
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4559.
Note that del_timer_sync has this problem too, but this
situation is forbidden by synchronization rules.
At the moment I don't have a proper solution.
One option is to change __mod_timer() so that it would not
switch ->base when the timer is already running. But this
would be behavioural change: currently __mod_timer() guarantees
that the timer would be armed on the local cpu.
I'll try to find a solution, but perhaps it's better to drop
this patch for now.
Oleg.
next parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-30 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20050429000038.1da6f2e1.akpm@osdl.org>
2005-04-30 12:42 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2005-04-30 17:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-04-30 20:10 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42737D3A.ABEF2022@tv-sign.ru \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=jk@blackdown.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maneesh@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®