From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
hughd@google.com, willy@infradead.org, ziy@nvidia.com,
liam@infradead.org, npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
dev.jain@arm.com, baohua@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 04/11] mm: khugepaged: add shmem mTHP collapse support
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 19:15:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4292a25b-5707-401c-9c8d-2210a165ea7c@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611024706.95748-1-lance.yang@linux.dev>
On 6/11/26 10:47 AM, Lance Yang wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 08:42:28AM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/10/26 8:44 PM, Lance Yang wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 06:29:12PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>> @@ -1512,8 +1517,12 @@ static enum scan_result mthp_collapse(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>>> enum scan_result ret;
>>>>
>>>> collapse_address = address + offset * PAGE_SIZE;
>>>> - ret = collapse_huge_page(mm, collapse_address, referenced,
>>>> - unmapped, cc, order);
>>>> + if (file)
>>>> + ret = collapse_file(mm, collapse_address, file,
>>>> + start + offset, cc, order);
>>>> + else
>>>> + ret = collapse_huge_page(mm, collapse_address,
>>>> + referenced, unmapped, cc, order);
>>>>
>>>> switch (ret) {
>>>> /* Cases where we continue to next collapse candidate */
>>>> @@ -1521,6 +1530,7 @@ static enum scan_result mthp_collapse(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>>> collapsed += nr_ptes;
>>>> fallthrough;
>>>> case SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE:
>>>
>>> Looks like SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE from collapse_file() get lost for
>>> the PMD-order case.
>>>
>>> Previously, collapse_file() returned it straight back to
>>> collapse_single_pmd(), so we would run try_collapse_pte_mapped_thp().
>>>
>>> Now it hits mthp_collapse() fitst, and that case just goes to
>>> next_offset ...
>>
>> This is the expected behavior. SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE is only returned
>> when the MADV_COLLAPSE collapse succeeds. In this case, if
>> collapse_file() still returns SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE, then
>> mthp_collapse() will ultimately return SCAN_FAIL (because collapsed ==
>> 0), even though the MADV_COLLAPSE collapse has already succeeded.
>>
>> Additionally, the SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE logic is already handled in
>> collapse_scan_file(), see:
>>
>> result = mthp_collapse(mm, file, start, addr, 0, 0, cc, enabled_orders);
>> if (result == SCAN_SUCCEED && !cc->is_khugepaged) {
>> /* If MADV_COLLAPSE, adjust result to call
>> collapse_pte_mapped_thp(). */
>> result = SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE;
>> }
>
> Right, I agree for that case. The one I meant is a bit different.
>
> I was looking at this earlier return from collapse_file():
>
> if (is_pmd_order(folio_order(folio))) {
> result = SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE;
> goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> Old code let it bubble back up:
>
> collapse_single_pmd()
> -> collapse_scan_file()
> -> collapse_file()
> -> SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE
> -> SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE
> -> try_collapse_pte_mapped_thp()
>
> Not limited to !is_khugepaged. collapse_single_pmd() only checked the
> result, then passed !cc->is_khugepaged as install_pmd.
>
> Now the same return goes through mthp_collapse() first:
>
> collapse_single_pmd()
> -> collapse_scan_file()
> -> mthp_collapse()
> -> collapse_file()
> -> SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE
> -> goto next_offset
>
> So collapse_single_pmd() never sees SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE for this
> case anymore. Hopefully Im not missing something here :)
Yes, you are right. I missed this case. Will fix. Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-11 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-10 10:29 [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] " Baolin Wang
2026-06-10 10:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/11] mm: khugepaged: add max_ptes_none check in collapse_file() Baolin Wang
2026-06-12 10:10 ` Nico Pache
2026-06-10 10:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/11] mm: khugepaged: generalize collapse_file() for shmem mTHP support Baolin Wang
2026-06-12 10:16 ` Nico Pache
2026-06-15 6:39 ` Baolin Wang
2026-06-10 10:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/11] mm: khugepaged: add an order check for PMD-sized THP statistics Baolin Wang
2026-06-10 10:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/11] mm: khugepaged: add shmem mTHP collapse support Baolin Wang
2026-06-10 12:13 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-11 0:31 ` Baolin Wang
2026-06-10 12:44 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-11 0:42 ` Baolin Wang
2026-06-11 2:47 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-11 11:15 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2026-06-12 10:22 ` Nico Pache
2026-06-15 6:46 ` Baolin Wang
2026-06-11 6:06 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-11 12:11 ` Baolin Wang
2026-06-10 10:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/11] mm: shmem: run khugepaged for all shmem mTHP orders Baolin Wang
2026-06-10 10:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/11] mm: khugepaged: allow khugepaged to check all shmem mTHP-sized orders Baolin Wang
2026-06-10 11:33 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-11 0:47 ` Baolin Wang
2026-06-10 10:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/11] mm: khugepaged: skip large folios that don't need to be collapsed Baolin Wang
2026-06-11 4:59 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-11 11:29 ` Baolin Wang
2026-06-10 10:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/11] selftests: mm: extend the check_huge() to support mTHP check Baolin Wang
2026-06-12 10:32 ` Nico Pache
2026-06-15 6:51 ` Baolin Wang
2026-06-10 10:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/11] selftests: mm: move gather_after_split_folio_orders() into vm_util.c file Baolin Wang
2026-06-10 10:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/11] selftests: mm: implement the mTHP-sized hugepage check helpers Baolin Wang
2026-06-10 10:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/11] selftests: mm: add mTHP collapse test cases Baolin Wang
2026-06-12 10:41 ` Nico Pache
2026-06-10 16:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] add shmem mTHP collapse support Nico Pache
2026-06-11 0:52 ` Baolin Wang
2026-06-11 6:18 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-06-11 11:46 ` Baolin Wang
2026-06-11 12:15 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4292a25b-5707-401c-9c8d-2210a165ea7c@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome