From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751338AbdBZWOA (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:14:00 -0500 Received: from ec2-52-27-115-49.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com ([52.27.115.49]:59947 "EHLO osg.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751221AbdBZWN6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:13:58 -0500 Subject: Re: [ieee802154_unregister_hw] bea5b158ff BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/1/0x00000002 To: Alexander Aring , Fengguang Wu References: <20170226094334.z4sz7yk3loxagi7z@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> <79b37cfd-5084-59a6-9044-cdc2017e1fa2@pengutronix.de> Cc: Marcel Holtmann , Rob Herring , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, LKP From: Stefan Schmidt Message-ID: <429e0a0c-dc05-0785-5885-01bc19c8e502@osg.samsung.com> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 23:12:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <79b37cfd-5084-59a6-9044-cdc2017e1fa2@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello. On 02/26/2017 12:07 PM, Alexander Aring wrote: > > Hi, > > On 02/26/2017 10:43 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> FYI, this debug patch discloses an old-but-still-active bug in >> ieee802154/fakelb. The attached reproduce-* script may help debug it. >> > > fixed by: bdca1fd9a6df ("fakelb: fix schedule while atomic"). Some more context. Looking at your config and script file names they suggest this is tested with 4.8.0-rc4. Fengguang, is that correct? The fix from above is in 4.8.0-rc7 git describe bdca1fd9a6df v4.8-rc6-1377-gbdca1fd > It should be send to stable. Stefan can you do that please? The latest stable kernel is 4.10.1 and the latest longterm stable is 4.9.13. Both of them should have this fix already. If there is a desire I could try sending it for the older longterm stable tree 4.4.x. Not sure if this is really worth the effort. Comments? regards Stefan Schmidt