From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262136AbVFRPb0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2005 11:31:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262135AbVFRPb0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2005 11:31:26 -0400 Received: from smtp2.poczta.interia.pl ([213.25.80.232]:13405 "EHLO smtp.poczta.interia.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262136AbVFRPbN (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2005 11:31:13 -0400 Message-ID: <42B43E3B.4080307@poczta.fm> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 17:31:07 +0200 From: Lukasz Stelmach User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: pl, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 7eggert@gmx.de Cc: Lennart Sorensen , mru@inprovide.com, Patrick McFarland , "Alexander E. Patrakov" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS. References: <4eUwr-7i7-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <4ffAV-72e-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <4fBrR-7eO-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <4fBUW-7wi-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <4fCe4-7Rm-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <4fCHg-89R-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <4fHxo-3Lo-63@gated-at.bofh.it> <4fNMd-l6-25@gated-at.bofh.it> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig72946D0BEBFC29B0C5F23F1C" X-EMID: 50c09138 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig72946D0BEBFC29B0C5F23F1C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bodo Eggert napisa=C5=82(a): >>VFAT uses unicode? I thought it used the same codepage silyness as FAT= >>did, since after all ti was just supposed to be a long filename >>extension to FAT. Do they use unicode in the long filenames only? >=20 >=20 > It uses two codepages, one for short names and one for long names. > The long name charset defaults to iso-8859-1, Please look below where you have got "t.e.s.t.". That is obviously UTF-16 (below FFFF) not iso-8859-1. > and the short one to cp437 Yes. > 0600 41 74 00 65 00 73 00 74 00 e4 00 0f 00 db f6 00 At.e.s.t ......= =2E. > 0610 fc 00 df 00 74 00 65 00 73 00 00 00 74 00 00 00 ....t.e. s...t.= =2E. > 0620 54 45 53 54 8e 99 7e 31 20 20 20 20 00 00 d0 58 TEST..~1 ..= =2EX > 0630 d1 32 d1 32 00 00 d0 58 d1 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 .2.2...X .2....= =2E. Has anybode seen characters above 0xFFFF on the vfat? --=20 By=C5=82o mi bardzo mi=C5=82o. Trzecia pospolita kl=C4= =99ska, [...] >=C5=81ukasz< Ju=C5=BC nie katolicka lecz z=C5=82odz= iejska. (c)PP --------------enig72946D0BEBFC29B0C5F23F1C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCtD4/NdzY8sm9K9wRAvBkAJ0fiV7wHInW2J23P+ofWt7Jygd4VgCePcXS tii4CV7nFj427ZktlpKRP0U= =SbYZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig72946D0BEBFC29B0C5F23F1C--