From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261937AbVGSJMJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2005 05:12:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261939AbVGSJMJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2005 05:12:09 -0400 Received: from smtp2.rz.tu-harburg.de ([134.28.205.13]:63334 "EHLO smtp2.rz.tu-harburg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261937AbVGSJMH (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2005 05:12:07 -0400 Message-ID: <42DCC454.7080706@tu-harburg.de> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:13:56 +0200 From: Jan Blunck User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 7eggert@gmx.de CC: Andrew Morton , torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ramfs: pretend dirent sizes References: <4qoKs-6yv-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <4qoU5-6CQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <4qvsI-32Y-17@gated-at.bofh.it> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Bodo Eggert wrote: > Jan Blunck wrote: > >>Andrew Morton wrote: > > >> > Does it really matter? >> > >> >>Yes! At least for me and my union mounts implementation. > > > Is there a reason for not using size == link-count (or even static)? Yes, the link count is only increased for subdirectories (because of the ".." link) and not for regular files. Jan