From: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
To: James Bruce <bruce@andrew.cmu.edu>
Cc: sclark46@earthlink.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Power consumption HZ100, HZ250, HZ1000: new numbers
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:22:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42FBA55B.5030306@rainbow-software.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42F30992.9080605@andrew.cmu.edu>
James Bruce wrote:
> Ondrej Zary wrote:
>
>> James Bruce wrote:
>>
>>> Stephen Clark wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe new desktop systems - but what about the tens of millions of
>>>> old systems that don't.
>>>
>>>
>>> If it's an old system, it probably doesn't have working ACPI C-states
>>> though. Without that, low HZ does not save you anything. I should
>>> have said: 99% of desktops with the capability to do ACPI sleep have
>>> at least one USB device attached (usually a mouse).
>>
>>
>> rainbow@pentium:~$ cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/power
>> active state: C2
>> max_cstate: C8
>> bus master activity: 00000000
>> states:
>> C1: type[C1] promotion[C2] demotion[--]
>> latency[000] usage[00052470]
>> *C2: type[C2] promotion[--] demotion[C1]
>> latency[090] usage[02699149]
>>
>> This is PCPartner TXB820DS motherboard (Socket 7, i430TX) with 1998
>> Award BIOS and C-states seem to work fine. I've tested it in Windows
>> 98 some time ago - the CPU is almost cold when idle with ACPI enabled
>> and hot with ACPI disabled (that's partly caused by the fact that
>> Windows 9x does not HLT the CPU when idle). With Pentium 100MHz in the
>> socket and ACPI enabled, I could even touch the CPU (without heatsink)
>> without burning my fingers.
>
>
> Ok I stand corrected, I had no idea there were machines that old where
> ACPI worked correctly in Linux.
>
> Do you see the same kind of heat reduction in Linux as Win98? What HZ
> value are you using, as the latency for entering C2 on your machine
> looks pretty substantial (Your C2 almost looks like a new machine's C3
> state, which is supposedly the first level where substantial power
> savings occur on a new machines).
>
I did some tests:
1. disconnected CPU fan power
2. booted 2.6.12 (compiled with HZ=100) with init=/bin/sh
3. left it idling on the shell prompt and checked CPU heatsink
temperature (by hand) - only warm
4. rebooted the same kernel with acpi=off init=/bin/sh
5. left it idling on the shell prompt and checked CPU heatsink
temperature - warm and slowly getting hot
6. rebooted the same kernel with init=/bin/sh again
7. left it idling on the shell prompt and checked CPU heatsink
temperature - temperature went back to "warm" :)
Result: ACPI C2 state reduces CPU consumption here
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-11 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-29 22:49 Marc Ballarin
2005-07-29 23:15 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-30 10:06 ` Marc Ballarin
2005-07-30 18:05 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-30 18:18 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-07-30 18:14 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-30 18:35 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-01 20:00 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-30 19:51 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-30 20:04 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-30 20:10 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-31 20:21 ` James Bruce
2005-07-31 21:10 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-31 21:41 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-31 21:57 ` James Bruce
2005-07-31 22:32 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-31 23:20 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-08-01 1:59 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-08-02 9:08 ` Tomasz Torcz
2005-07-31 21:54 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-31 22:02 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-31 22:18 ` James Bruce
2005-07-31 22:07 ` Jim Crilly
2005-07-31 22:36 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-31 22:39 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-01 3:49 ` Jim Crilly
2005-08-01 7:26 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-01 18:16 ` Jim Crilly
2005-08-10 18:49 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-07-31 22:12 ` James Bruce
2005-07-31 22:47 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-31 23:23 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-31 23:29 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-31 23:53 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-01 7:28 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-10 19:00 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-08-01 6:19 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-08-01 16:07 ` Jan Knutar
2005-08-01 18:45 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 9:13 ` Tomasz Torcz
2005-08-02 14:58 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-01 7:44 ` David Weinehall
2005-08-01 16:18 ` James Bruce
2005-08-01 19:27 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-01 20:42 ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-08-02 4:50 ` James Bruce
2005-08-02 13:10 ` Stephen Clark
2005-08-02 14:02 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 14:12 ` Jens Axboe
2005-08-02 17:06 ` Folkert van Heusden
2005-08-02 17:45 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-08-02 17:55 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 14:15 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 14:20 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2005-08-02 14:22 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 15:18 ` Joel Jaeggli
2005-08-03 8:53 ` Oliver Neukum
2005-08-02 14:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-02 14:52 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 19:26 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2005-08-02 15:42 ` James Bruce
2005-08-02 15:58 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 17:02 ` Prakash Punnoor
2005-08-02 16:08 ` Ondrej Zary
2005-08-05 6:39 ` James Bruce
2005-08-11 19:22 ` Ondrej Zary [this message]
2005-08-03 9:19 ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
2005-08-03 13:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-08-04 12:52 ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
2005-08-02 6:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02 11:23 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-02 14:08 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02 14:31 ` Roman Zippel
2005-08-02 11:25 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-02 14:07 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-03 17:13 ` Stephen Ray
2005-08-03 19:12 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-30 20:08 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-30 10:06 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-10 19:08 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-08-03 15:20 ambx1
2005-08-03 16:47 ` James Bruce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42FBA55B.5030306@rainbow-software.org \
--to=linux@rainbow-software.org \
--cc=bruce@andrew.cmu.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sclark46@earthlink.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome