From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F05BC43144 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 23:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A1227A7A for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 23:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com header.i=@broadcom.com header.b="Sp12u3cA" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 42A1227A7A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=broadcom.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S967312AbeF1XvG (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2018 19:51:06 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f193.google.com ([209.85.216.193]:32918 "EHLO mail-qt0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S967125AbeF1XvD (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2018 19:51:03 -0400 Received: by mail-qt0-f193.google.com with SMTP id l10-v6so6414553qtj.0 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:51:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jQHIaTDL5DkUMSHH6G5cjyJ5MIspbu+IfJPSHaH19sY=; b=Sp12u3cAP2wwR2mlBNYajnDxZPwAs86P7sr0znUNzTB2DWZafLCA0/DmI7jbMTlRMq b+L1JqNWqNNwnydAOoDVmdizlUPo2rxLz2d6bEq99zyjdHh5s1F9ET3oEzpvd0rlDbm4 /05y4d5vfQqRLyCfqx1Y7680Q/3PcWu/V2+Xg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jQHIaTDL5DkUMSHH6G5cjyJ5MIspbu+IfJPSHaH19sY=; b=PfEq2p5pw3Owd+OJa51QUPN4oI1y74MtNqmNRDLG7cxCpkVL83i0pm7vJ217MT1GlW seaeZpbNXu0CCIAbjMWiaHM+J1VJ3mLRExculld62AJ/NOT1Og6CEKM+kpNFi3MtXkLI COH4sH3H3YTaOor9fal9IVdPGSBuh0CFTXKsdglRl5uShnsd3UnLG4X/aTQIIqNdwcJr MWuu3ghSgjKCnq5U7FI/uGjXnIvWusZG5ceC7yfQbJ49avhI4Z6L3javjIFz2+hAbcJ5 F6RkxP4yE0IL0uO6d9hE+2jkcMPOBX1HfJ0WDt7dKkS7Ewp2fPbVkG+sPz0TOgYQdQnp TNuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E37Z5A0k9ecFg+iv/GMKMUYmrNeSbQFNrDAfz22Gn6C1H7JzsLJ YQ3Lp26Rw2LzgiEg8SZ95Vk6dw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfxowiUK4pZVa4cVe383toZEF2MKH9IfnO4xydLl/vVcq2tYkWNo+xSJDAZDxYM1vfZT3f/6A== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:282a:: with SMTP id 39-v6mr11692147qtq.109.1530229862243; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:51:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.136.8.248] ([192.19.228.250]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l84-v6sm1560640qki.69.2018.06.28.16.50.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:51:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] Documentation: DT: Consolidate SP805 binding docs To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Rob Herring , Wim Van Sebroeck , Mark Rutland , Frank Rowand , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Robin Murphy , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , BCM Kernel Feedback References: <1527530497-10392-2-git-send-email-ray.jui@broadcom.com> <20180605194124.GA26885@rob-hp-laptop> <09c870cd-0a44-6634-58d8-f57f9fcd0cb5@broadcom.com> <46ca340f-4347-94ca-6463-d38bece820e2@broadcom.com> <20180627183327.GD16753@roeck-us.net> <20180627184234.GA19538@roeck-us.net> <8483f675-0c7d-4b0f-25fd-a5eff4bc7937@broadcom.com> <20180627185529.GB19743@roeck-us.net> From: Ray Jui Message-ID: <42b856bf-2dc1-f69b-44e1-f5a04715f673@broadcom.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:50:57 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180627185529.GB19743@roeck-us.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Guenter/Florian, On 6/27/2018 11:55 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:47:21AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: >> >> >> On 6/27/2018 11:42 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:38:48AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 6/27/2018 11:33 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:39:16AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: >>>>>> Hi Guenter/Rob, >>>>>> >>>>>> Kindly let me know how you want to proceed with this? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If I recall correctly, the patch series does not add a new problem >>>>> but merely exposes one. Is my recollection correct ? If so, maybe >>>>> we should just add a note somewhere indicating what might be wrong >>>>> and otherwise apply the series. >>>>> >>>>> Does this make sense ? >>>> >>>> Yes this makes a lot of sense to me. This patch series exposes potential >>>> problems in some SoCs that they might not be feeding the correct clock into >>>> WDT, at least based on clock names from their DT entries. >>>> >>>> This patch series does not change/affect how SP805 works on those systems. >>>> >>>> Where should the note be added? >>>> >>> >>> I would suggest to add a note into the driver where the clock is used, >>> with the details discussed here. >> >> I assume you meant adding the notes to the SP805 driver where the clock is >> used. >> >> If so, I think that makes sense. That notes deserves its own patch because >> it really has nothing to do with any of the change in this patch series. >> >> Do you want me to 1) embed that patch into this patch series and send out >> v5; or 2) leave the patch series as it is and send out a separate patch to >> add the notes to the driver? >> > 2) is fine. I don't have the series here right now; if I recall correctly > all patches in the series are all marked as Reviewed-by: and/or Acked-by:. > If so, I'll apply them to my tree tonight, or at least the ones that will > go in through the watchdog tree. > > Guenter > Guenter, please let us know once you take the first 4 patches. Florian, could you please help with the last 2, once Guenter confirmed the first 4 are merged. Thanks! Ray