From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56DCC49EA6 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 07:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FC46100A for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 07:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231480AbhFXH1L (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 03:27:11 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:27903 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230402AbhFXH1K (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 03:27:10 -0400 IronPort-SDR: ACeHjnRIxo5gq0/JnzROf0KdByGO+0b4dmDtCJPKZ4qMUjVnQXV5kotNWuu50jeAsNtZxS//Tr Y8hv0q6ceiAg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10024"; a="194554410" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,296,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="194554410" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Jun 2021 00:24:46 -0700 IronPort-SDR: byMIhorD8aj1Ehow8p51UHfc6vAhTFBXZbY33EiRdkdvjL8brvMKiWK+coiPtEfgKjC0Yo7K6t BvDjWu/2E+Ew== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,295,1616482800"; d="scan'208";a="406555503" Received: from ahunter-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.72.79]) ([10.237.72.79]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Jun 2021 00:24:42 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Refactor ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed() To: keosung.park@samsung.com, "joe@perches.com" , ALIM AKHTAR , "avri.altman@wdc.com" , "jejb@linux.ibm.com" , "martin.petersen@oracle.com" , "stanley.chu@mediatek.com" , "cang@codeaurora.org" , "beanhuo@micron.com" , "asutoshd@codeaurora.org" , Kiwoong Kim , "satyat@google.com" , "bvanassche@acm.org" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Joao Pinto , Pedro Sousa , Pedro Sousa References: <1891546521.01624267081897.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp4> <37380050.31624517282371.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp4> From: Adrian Hunter Organization: Intel Finland Oy, Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki, Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4, Domiciled in Helsinki Message-ID: <42c2978f-f0ca-3efb-7762-cac813a0a5fe@intel.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 10:25:03 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <37380050.31624517282371.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp4> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 24/06/21 9:41 am, Keoseong Park wrote: >> On 21/06/21 11:51 am, Keoseong Park wrote: >>> Change conditional compilation to IS_ENABLED macro, >>> and simplify if else statement to return statement. >>> No functional change. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Keoseong Park >>> --- >>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 17 ++++++++--------- >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h >>> index c98d540ac044..6d239a855753 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h >>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h >>> @@ -893,16 +893,15 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_is_rpm_autosuspend_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba) >>> >>> static inline bool ufshcd_is_intr_aggr_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba) >>> { >>> -/* DWC UFS Core has the Interrupt aggregation feature but is not detectable*/ >>> -#ifndef CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC >>> - if ((hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) && >>> - !(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR)) >>> + /* >>> + * DWC UFS Core has the Interrupt aggregation feature >>> + * but is not detectable. >>> + */ >>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC)) >> >> Why is this needed? It seems like you could just set UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR >> and clear UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR instead? > > Hello Adrian, > Sorry for late reply. > > The code that returns true when CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC is set in the original code > is only changed using the IS_ENABLED macro. > (Linux kernel coding style, 21) Conditional Compilation) > > When CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC is not defined, the code for checking quirk > and caps has been moved to the newly added return statement below. Looking closer I cannot find CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC at all. It seems like it never existed. Why should we not remove the code related to CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_DWC entirely? > > Thanks, > Keoseong > >> >>> return true; >>> - else >>> - return false; >>> -#else >>> -return true; >>> -#endif >>> + >>> + return (hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_INTR_AGGR) && >>> + !(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_INTR_AGGR); >>> } >>> >>> static inline bool ufshcd_can_aggressive_pc(struct ufs_hba *hba) >>> >>