From: Tangnianyao <tangnianyao@huawei.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"guoyang (C)" <guoyang2@huawei.com>,
jiangkunkun <jiangkunkun@huawei.com>,
wangwudi <wangwudi@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] irqchip/gic-v4: Fix VMAPP/VMOVP races
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 16:41:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42e08881-5faf-a78c-0d94-2a48415bc655@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce1c797f-1b00-2f14-de1d-b3524acf3c1f@huawei.com>
Hi, Marc
I meet another problem while fixing this in kernel 5.10.
Kernel 5.10 does not support guard and we replace it with raw_spin_lock/unlock.
When guest insmod nic drivers, it trigger host cpu power off somehow. The same
testcase runs quite good in kernel 6.6(both host and guest).
Would you fix this on long-term kernel 5.10? Or any sugguestion?
Thanks for your help.
Nianyao Tang
On 7/8/2024 10:02, Tangnianyao wrote:
>
> On 7/5/2024 17:31, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> In 20240701072305.4129823-1-tangnianyao@huawei.com, Nianyao reports
>> a number of possible races that can trigger on GICv4 implementations
>> using the ITSList feature.
>>
>> These races involve concurrent VMOVP and VMAPP, the former happening
>> on vcpu load, while the latter is triggered on the first device being
>> MAPTI'd on a given ITS for this particular guest.
>>
>> The main issue is that we want to establish the affinity at VMAPP time,
>> while vcpu_load wants to set the affinity where the vcpu actually runs.
>> Lock ordering constraints mean that we can't lock the VPE on VMAPP,
>> so things are modified without any lock. What could possibly go wrong?
>>
>> THe fix is a bit involved, and relies on 3 things:
>>
>> - Making sure that the initial affinity of a VPE is fixed at activate
>> time, which is done early in the life of the vcpup, before it can run.
>>
>> - Add a per-VM lock that can be taken instead of the global vmovp_lock,
>> paving the way for a more manageable lock order.
>>
>> - Take the per-VPE lock whenever modifying the VPE affinity, as expected
>> everywhere else in the code.
>>
>> With that, VMAPP and VMOVP can now run concurrently and still lead to
>> sensible results.
>>
>> Marc Zyngier (3):
>> irqchip/gic-v4: Always configure affinity on VPE activation
>> irqchip/gic-v4: Substitute vmovp_lock for a per-VM lock
>> irqchip/gic-v4: Make sure a VPE is locked when VMAPP is issued
>>
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 48 ++++++++++++++----------------
>> include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h | 8 +++++
>> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
> I've tested this patch series. It works.
>
> Tested-by: Nianyao Tang <tangnianyao@huawei.com>
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-17 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-05 9:31 Marc Zyngier
2024-07-05 9:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] irqchip/gic-v4: Always configure affinity on VPE activation Marc Zyngier
2024-07-10 16:42 ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2024-07-15 13:20 ` tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2024-07-05 9:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] irqchip/gic-v4: Substitute vmovp_lock for a per-VM lock Marc Zyngier
2024-07-10 16:42 ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2024-07-15 13:20 ` tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2024-07-05 9:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] irqchip/gic-v4: Make sure a VPE is locked when VMAPP is issued Marc Zyngier
2024-07-10 16:42 ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2024-07-15 13:20 ` tip-bot2 for Marc Zyngier
2024-07-19 9:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] " Zhou Wang
2024-07-19 11:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-07-23 1:51 ` Zhou Wang
2024-07-23 17:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-07-24 1:13 ` Zhou Wang
2024-07-08 2:02 ` [PATCH 0/3] irqchip/gic-v4: Fix VMAPP/VMOVP races Tangnianyao
2024-07-17 8:41 ` Tangnianyao [this message]
2024-07-17 9:21 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42e08881-5faf-a78c-0d94-2a48415bc655@huawei.com \
--to=tangnianyao@huawei.com \
--cc=guoyang2@huawei.com \
--cc=jiangkunkun@huawei.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wangwudi@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®