mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Cc: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, joro@8bytes.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] soc: mediatek: Init MT8173 scpsys driver earlier
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:54:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42e4a2ad-4349-6d64-b170-c31963d0416f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1468314071.24705.4.camel@mhfsdcap03>

Hi Yong,

On 07/12/2016 11:01 AM, Yong Wu wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 14:47 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>> On 06/07/16 07:22, James Liao wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2016-07-02 at 18:35 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 05/16/2016 11:28 AM, James Liao wrote:
>>>>> Some power domain comsumers may init before module_init.
>>>>> So the power domain provider (scpsys) need to be initialized
>>>>> earlier too.
>>>>>
>>>>> Take an example for our IOMMU (M4U) and SMI. SMI is a bridge
>>>>> between IOMMU and multimedia HW. SMI is responsible to
>>>>> enable/disable iommu and help transfer data for each multimedia
>>>>> HW. Both of them have to wait until the power and clocks are
>>>>> enabled.
>>>>>
>>>>> So scpsys driver should be initialized before SMI, and SMI should
>>>>> be initialized before IOMMU, and then init IOMMU consumers
>>>>> (display/vdec/venc/camera etc.).
>>>>>
>>>>> IOMMU is subsys_init by default. So we need to init scpsys driver
>>>>> before subsys_init.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
>>>>> index 5870a24..00c0adb 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
>>>>> @@ -617,4 +617,21 @@ static struct platform_driver scpsys_drv = {
>>>>>   		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(of_scpsys_match_tbl),
>>>>>   	},
>>>>>   };
>>>>> -builtin_platform_driver(scpsys_drv);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static int __init scpsys_drv_init(void)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +	return platform_driver_register(&scpsys_drv);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/*
>>>>> + * There are some Mediatek drivers which depend on the power domain driver need
>>>>> + * to probe in earlier initcall levels. So scpsys driver also need to probe
>>>>> + * earlier.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * IOMMU(M4U) and SMI drivers for example. SMI is a bridge between IOMMU and
>>>>> + * multimedia HW. IOMMU depends on SMI, and SMI is a power domain consumer,
>>>>> + * so the proper probe sequence should be scpsys -> SMI -> IOMMU driver.
>>>>> + * IOMMU drivers are initialized during subsys_init by default, so we need to
>>>>> + * move SMI and scpsys drivers to subsys_init or earlier init levels.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +subsys_initcall(scpsys_drv_init);
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can't we achieve this with probe deferring? I'm not really keen on
>>>> coding the order of the different drivers like this.
>>>
>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>
>>> Some drivers such as IOMMU don't support probe deferring. So scpsys need
>>> to init before them by changing init level.
>>>
>>
>> SMI larbs return EPROBE_DEFER if it can't find the PM provider for it's
>> domain, so this part should not be the problem. The larbs get added as
>> components in the probe, when the PM provider is present.
>>
>> The iommu driver uses the larbs as components. As long as not all
>> components are present the iommu does not bind them. So from what I see
>> this should work without any problem.
>>
>> Can you please specify where the iommu dirver has a problem. Maybe we
>> need to fix the driver rather then scpsys.
>
> We got a problem while bootup, the hang backtrace is like below(Sorry, I
> can't find the full backtrace now):
>
> [    7.832359] Call trace:
> [    7.834778] [<ffffffc000764424>] mtk_smi_larb_get+0x24/0xa8
> [    7.840300] [<ffffffc0005a1390>] mtk_drm_crtc_enable+0x6c/0x450
>
> The reason is that "larb->mmu" is NULL while DRM call mtk_smi_larb_get.
>
> DRM call iommu_present to wait for whether IOMMU is ready[1].
> But in the  MTK-IOMMU, It will call
> bus_set_iommu->mtk_iommu_add_device->mtk_iommu_attach_device, then it's
> able to transfer "struct mtk_smi_iommu" to SMI whose probe maybe delayed
> by power-domain, then SMI could finish its probe.
>
> So If DRM probe is called after the time of calling bus_set_iommu and
> before the time of SMI probe finish, this problem can be reproduced.
>
> The root cause is that iommu_present cann't indicate that MTK-IOMMU and
> SMI is ready actually. in other words, the DRM cann't detect
> whether the SMI has probed done.
>
> If we move scpsys_init from module_initcall to subsys_initcall, the
> IOMMU and SMI could be probe done during the subsys_initcall period.
> this issue can be avoid.
> And as we grep before, there are also some examples whose power-domain
> is also not module_init[2].
> core_initcall(exynos4_pm_init_power_domain);
> subsys_initcall(imx_pgc_init);
>
> If you think that this patch will hide the problem above, then I have to
> add a new function, like below:
> //==================
> bool mtk_smi_larb_ready(struct device *larbdev)
> {
> 	struct mtk_smi_larb *larb = dev_get_drvdata(larbdev);
>
> 	return larb && !!larb->mmu;
> }
> //=================
>
> And in the probe of all the MTK-IOMMU consumer, we have to add this:
> //====================
> 	if (!mtk_smi_larb_ready(&larb_pdev->dev))
> 		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> //====================
>
> The sequence is a little complex, If I don't explain clearly, please
> tell me.
> Any other suggestion about this? Thanks.

I'm still trying to find a different way to solve this. Unfortunately 
I'm not able to reproduce this on my mt8173-evb...

...but: iommu_present checkes if the bus->iommu_ops is set. If we set 
these option in the iommu after all components got initialized, we 
should be fine. Or did I miss something?

Would you mind trying the patch below (against v4.9-rc1)?
If you know of any way to reproduce this issue, I would be happy to know.

I'm adding Joerg, the iommu maintainer, maybe he has an idea.

Thanks a lot,
Matthias

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
index b12c12d..9249011 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
@@ -602,10 +602,12 @@ static int mtk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
         if (ret)
                 return ret;

-       if (!iommu_present(&platform_bus_type))
+       ret = component_master_add_with_match(dev, &mtk_iommu_com_ops, 
match);
+
+       if (ret && !iommu_present(&platform_bus_type))
                 bus_set_iommu(&platform_bus_type, &mtk_iommu_ops);

-       return component_master_add_with_match(dev, &mtk_iommu_com_ops, 
match);
+       return ret;
  }

  static int mtk_iommu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-26 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-16  9:28 [PATCH v7 0/4] Mediatek MT2701 SCPSYS power domain support James Liao
2016-05-16  9:28 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] soc: mediatek: Refine scpsys to support multiple platform James Liao
2016-07-02 16:33   ` Matthias Brugger
2016-07-06  5:39     ` James Liao
2016-07-07 11:20       ` Matthias Brugger
2016-07-11  8:56         ` James Liao
2016-07-11 13:10           ` Matthias Brugger
2016-07-12  1:52             ` Yingjoe Chen
2016-07-12  3:34             ` James Liao
2016-07-12  8:21               ` Matthias Brugger
2016-05-16  9:28 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] soc: mediatek: Init MT8173 scpsys driver earlier James Liao
2016-07-02 16:35   ` Matthias Brugger
2016-07-06  5:22     ` James Liao
2016-07-08 12:47       ` Matthias Brugger
2016-07-12  9:01         ` Yong Wu
2016-10-26 14:54           ` Matthias Brugger [this message]
2016-05-16  9:28 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] soc: mediatek: Add MT2701 power dt-bindings James Liao
2016-05-16  9:28 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] soc: mediatek: Add MT2701 scpsys driver James Liao
2016-07-02 16:41   ` Matthias Brugger
2016-07-06  5:17     ` James Liao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42e4a2ad-4349-6d64-b170-c31963d0416f@gmail.com \
    --to=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome