mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: jeyu@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: fix validate_section_offset() overflow bug on 64-bit
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:36:13 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42f46af4-4698-f235-9d1a-749774b5cee8@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YWnvN7jHdWHl/05D@bombadil.infradead.org>

On 10/15/21 3:14 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 02:57:41PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> validate_section_offset() uses unsigned long local variable to
>> add/store shdr->sh_offset and shdr->sh_size on all platforms.
>> unsigned long is too short when sh_offset is Elf64_Off which
>> would be the case on 64bit ELF headers.
>>
>> Fix the overflow problem using the right size local variable when
>> CONFIG_64BIT is defined.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
> 
> Thanks for doing this! I put this through the 0-day grinder.
> 
> In the meantime, since this talks about a fix, can the commit log be a
> bit more descriptive about the impact of not applying the fix? In what
> situation would not having this patch applied create an issue? Is this
> theoretical or can an issue really happen. Has an issue gone
> undiscovered for a while, and if so what could the consequences
> have been all along?
> 

I found this when I was adding an error message to print the offset and
size.

> And it would seem this issue was found through code inspection, not
> through a real bug, correct? If this can be clarified on the commit log
> as well that would be great!
> 

Sent v2 with updated commit log.

thanks,
-- Shuah

      reply	other threads:[~2021-10-18 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-15 20:57 [PATCH v2] module: change to print useful messages from elf_validity_check() Shuah Khan
2021-10-15 20:57 ` [PATCH] module: fix validate_section_offset() overflow bug on 64-bit Shuah Khan
2021-10-15 21:14   ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-10-18 17:36     ` Shuah Khan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42f46af4-4698-f235-9d1a-749774b5cee8@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®