Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > here are schedulers benchmark (part2): > [bits deleted] Here's a summary of your output generated using the attached Python script. | Build Statistics | Overall Statistics ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Scheduler| Real CPU SYS TPT | CPU TPT delay CXSW | (secs) (secs) (%) (%) | (secs) (%) (secs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ingosched| 3128.5 5056.3 8.18 161.6 | 5379.5 171.9 159367.4 1556452 staircase| 3131.2 5032.6 8.09 160.7 | 5352.9 170.9 135193.0 1670366 spa_no_frills| 3103.8 5049.5 7.98 162.7 | 5266.7 169.7 172384.8 520937 zaphod(d,d)| 3561.7 4823.8 9.25 135.4 | 5132.0 144.1 148361.5 1771617 zaphod(d,0)| 3551.2 4809.9 9.19 135.4 | 5114.7 144.0 144022.0 1784814 zaphod(0,d)| 3126.8 5063.2 8.11 161.9 | 5278.1 168.8 173438.4 573587 zaphod(0,0)| 3105.5 5052.9 7.98 162.7 | 5254.8 169.2 165774.4 577534 nicksched| 3294.7 5095.1 9.10 154.6 | 5425.4 164.6 104298.2 2205665 where the (x,y) after zaphod means (max_ia_bonus, max_tpt_bonus) and "d" means default. I had to kill a few significant digits to squeeze it into 71 columns. Overall statistics are extracted from the schedstats data. In the "Build Statistics" "CPU" is the sum of the user and sys times and "SYS" is the percentage of that which was sys time (as I feel that is a better thing to compare than raw sys times). I was intrigued by the fact that zaphod(d,d) and zaphod(d,0) take longer in real time but use less cpu. I was assuming that this meant that some other job was getting some cpu but the schedstats data doesn't support that. Also it wouldn't make sense anyway as you'd expect jobs doing the same amount of work to use roughly the same amount of cpu. My latest theory is that your machine has hyper threads and this artifact is caused by the mechanism in the scheduler for handling tasks with differing priority in sibling hyper thread channels. Does your system have hyper threads? Peter -- Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au "Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious." -- Ambrose Bierce