From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965126AbVHZRQz (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:16:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965129AbVHZRQz (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:16:55 -0400 Received: from dbl.q-ag.de ([213.172.117.3]:27852 "EHLO dbl.q-ag.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965126AbVHZRQy (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:16:54 -0400 Message-ID: <430F4E57.3000001@colorfullife.com> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 19:16:07 +0200 From: Manfred Spraul User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050719 Fedora/1.7.10-1.5.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pekka J Enberg CC: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pipe: do not return POLLERR for fifo_poll References: <20050825170217.666edda3.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pekka J Enberg wrote: >FWIW I have been running on this for few days now without any noticeable >regressions. We get a solved FIXME in return but like I said I am a happy >to remove the redundant abstraction if this is too risky. > > > I would prefer just to remove the abstraction, together with a comment that Linux fifos behave exactly like pipes, unlike the behavior of most unices. -- Manfred