From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753941Ab0BIJ2G (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2010 04:28:06 -0500 Received: from mail-qy0-f200.google.com ([209.85.221.200]:60446 "EHLO mail-qy0-f200.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752256Ab0BIJ2E (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2010 04:28:04 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=RG5ZLjEaB4UVLVD8dYwsvtECW42m/gtpyXaydFJB/E9mD4gzjd1VMJE4mXaHPw2DNZ 7qWQy+7+Ru4PP1WC7qibiMdaJCUkHWR1Am27GZv/7Jc1sK3nYKXThO4nu6IJoUS09TZu 7wWzOQC39LIm6uhcTgVjCT9TxAYJiyMAVcHss= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <430c80e91002090103l5751d569pd306ca1f0ccca8ba@mail.gmail.com> References: <430c80e91002090103l5751d569pd306ca1f0ccca8ba@mail.gmail.com> From: Pranith Kumar Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:57:43 +0530 Message-ID: <430c80e91002090127u1742d043ub29f1c547fe73590@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: Possible performance improvement? To: LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Pranith Kumar Date: Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:33 PM Subject: Possible performance improvement? To: Ingo Molnar , LKML Hey Ingo, I recently happened to come across this thesis[1] which presents some very concrete results with stats regarding the performance of Linux CFS with an implementation of Redline. It would really be great if you could take some time out of your busy schedule and quickly look up the figures to see the performance comparison and if we could adapt some ideas. I am willing to give it a try if you think its worth it. Thanks, -- Pranith. [1] http://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1071&context=open_access_dissertations