From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: James.Smart@Emulex.Com, hch@infradead.org, jgarzik@pobox.com,
joshk@triplehelix.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, axboe@suse.de, torvalds@osdl.org,
rdunlap@xenotime.net
Subject: Re: SATA suspend/resume (was Re: [PATCH] updated version of Jens' SATA suspend-to-ram patch)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:56:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <433C0EBF.7080605@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9BB4DECD4CFE6D43AA8EA8D768ED51C21D7AC2@xbl3.ma.emulex.com>
I admit I haven't studied the patches. Anyway, here is what I have to
say about what I (mis?)understood from your posts:
James Smart wrote:
> You need to be careful on the power-up. Many JBODs share a single
> "enclosure" and that enclosure has a limited power supply. If all
> drives were spun up in parallel (and a drive may take 10-15seconds
> to spin up), then they can overload the enclosure's power limit.
[...]
> There were not a lot of great answers on how to solve this as it usually
> required knowledge of how the hardware was packaged.
[...]
>>On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 08:34:37AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>is an ULDD operation, not an LLDD one, and this fits the layering model
>>>much better.
The operation _involves_ the high level, yes. But whether it may be/
must not be performed has to be controlled by the transport layer. Take
FireWire as an example: IEEE 1394(a,b) has power management
specifications. (NB: Its indeed in IEEE 1394, not in the SBP-2 spec.)
One rule is that only one node on a FireWire bus may perform power
management; the node which is allowed to do this is determined by a
special protocol.
>>Actually one important thing is missing, that is a way to avoid spinning
>>down external disks. As a start a sysfs-controlable flag should do it,
>>later we can add transport-specific ways to find out whether a device
>>is external.
It is not a question of external vs. internal, at least not if you
consider more than SATA. Power management is the genuine task of
transport layers (specifically, of transport management layers). These
layers might need assistence from SCSI high-level protocol layer though.
IOW it's certainly correct to provide suspend/resume helpers in SCSI
high level (probably abstracted through SCSI core), but whether these
helpers are called or not has to be decided down in the SCSI low level,
or even further beneath that level.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=-= =--= ===-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-29 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-29 14:26 James.Smart
2005-09-29 15:56 ` Stefan Richter [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-23 16:33 [PATCH] updated version of Jens' SATA suspend-to-ram patch Joshua Kwan
2005-09-29 5:21 ` SATA suspend/resume (was Re: [PATCH] updated version of Jens' SATA suspend-to-ram patch) Jeff Garzik
2005-09-29 7:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-29 8:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-29 20:13 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-09-29 21:48 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-10-01 18:24 ` Mark Lord
2005-10-01 18:39 ` Randy.Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=433C0EBF.7080605@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=James.Smart@Emulex.Com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=joshk@triplehelix.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®