From: Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no>
To: Pierre Michon <pierre@no-spam.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, legal@lists.gpl-violations.org
Subject: Re: freebox possible GPL violation
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 11:42:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43439FF0.9050506@aitel.hist.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051005084738.GA29944@linux.ensimag.fr>
Pierre Michon wrote:
>==FREE and PRO-FREE CLAIMS (some claims could be find on [6])==
>
>A) The freebox is only lended, so the user can't ask for GPL source code.
>
>
If you lend someone linux, you're _distributing_ linux. The
GPL is about _distribution_ I believe, it doesn't have to be a _sale_.
You can't _lend_ someone windows (as a way of doing business) without
satisfying ms licencing terms either.
>-> They forgot that for wifi feature, you have buy a pcmcia card and
>that is card works wifi Linux driver. So according to GPL you could ask
>for wifi driver source code and all the Linux source code ???
>
>
Well, the wifi driver may or may not be under the GPL licence.
Check that first. The linux kernel itself is GPL of course.
>Also some people that don't return the freebox in time had to
>paid 400 Euros and they became the owner of the freebox. Free send to a
>client a letter [7] saying that if the user don't return the freebox,
>free could bill it and then it becomes propriety of the user :
>'Nous vous rappelons que conformément aux Conditions Générales de Vente ,
>en cas de non-restitution du modem, Free se réserve le droit de procéder
>à la facturation de l'équipement terminal, au prix mentionné dans les CGV,
>qui deviendra alors la *propriété* de l'Usager.'
>
>
>B) The freebox don't keep the Linux kernel in memory, it is downloaded
>at each boot.
>
>
Check where it is downloaded from, that is where linux
is being distributed from. Likely the same company though.
>C) 'Free' is a network operator and needs to keep secret some informations
>in order to preserve security on its networks.
>
>
They don't need to keep the kernel secret for security. Of course they
can still
keep their scripts secret, their (non-GPL) userland utilities secret, their
proprietary drivers secret and the hw specs secret. Good or bad, it is
up to them. But it seems to me they have to offer the kernel source,
at least.
Helge Hafting
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-05 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-05 8:47 Pierre Michon
2005-10-05 9:42 ` Helge Hafting [this message]
2005-10-15 9:40 ` Loic Dachary
2005-10-19 17:58 ` Pierre Michon
2005-10-20 15:29 ` Loic Dachary
2005-10-05 10:08 Pierre Michon
2005-10-05 10:18 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-05 11:13 Pierre Michon
2005-10-05 11:22 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-05 11:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-05 11:37 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-05 11:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-05 12:02 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-05 12:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-05 12:29 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-05 12:45 ` Michael Poole
2005-10-05 17:11 ` Alexandre Oliva
2005-10-06 0:07 ` Helge Hafting
2005-10-06 0:49 ` David Lang
2005-10-06 1:12 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2005-10-06 2:25 ` David Lang
2005-10-06 9:20 ` Helge Hafting
2005-10-06 9:51 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-06 9:53 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-06 11:39 ` Helge Hafting
2005-10-06 13:05 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-06 13:42 ` Michael Poole
2005-10-06 14:19 ` Helge Hafting
2005-10-06 20:15 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2005-10-11 2:27 ` David Schwartz
2005-10-11 10:48 ` Graham Murray
2005-10-05 12:15 ` Vincent Hanquez
2005-10-05 11:45 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-10-05 11:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-10-05 11:50 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-05 15:08 Pierre Michon
2005-10-05 15:12 Pierre Michon
2005-10-05 15:18 Pierre Michon
2005-10-05 15:49 ` Vincent Hanquez
2005-10-05 16:06 Pierre Michon
2005-10-05 16:47 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-05 17:57 Pierre Michon
2005-10-06 12:01 Pierre Michon
2005-10-06 13:06 ` Emmanuel Fleury
2005-10-06 13:40 ` Michael Poole
2005-10-06 14:48 ` Matan Peled
2005-10-06 23:26 Pierre Michon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43439FF0.9050506@aitel.hist.no \
--to=helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no \
--cc=legal@lists.gpl-violations.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pierre@no-spam.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®