From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, zhukeqian1@huawei.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: arm64: Distinguish cases of memcache allocations completely
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 16:35:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4348b555-2a38-6f00-8ef0-0d5fd801d753@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210326031654.3716-3-wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Hi Yanan,
On 3/26/21 3:16 AM, Yanan Wang wrote:
> With a guest translation fault, the memcache pages are not needed if KVM
> is only about to install a new leaf entry into the existing page table.
> And with a guest permission fault, the memcache pages are also not needed
> for a write_fault in dirty-logging time if KVM is only about to update
> the existing leaf entry instead of collapsing a block entry into a table.
>
> By comparing fault_granule and vma_pagesize, cases that require allocations
> from memcache and cases that don't can be distinguished completely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 1eec9f63bc6f..05af40dc60c1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -810,19 +810,6 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
> gfn = fault_ipa >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
>
> - /*
> - * Permission faults just need to update the existing leaf entry,
> - * and so normally don't require allocations from the memcache. The
> - * only exception to this is when dirty logging is enabled at runtime
> - * and a write fault needs to collapse a block entry into a table.
> - */
> - if (fault_status != FSC_PERM || (logging_active && write_fault)) {
> - ret = kvm_mmu_topup_memory_cache(memcache,
> - kvm_mmu_cache_min_pages(kvm));
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> mmu_seq = vcpu->kvm->mmu_notifier_seq;
> /*
> * Ensure the read of mmu_notifier_seq happens before we call
> @@ -880,6 +867,18 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
> else if (cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_CACHE_DIC))
> prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_X;
>
> + /*
> + * Allocations from the memcache are required only when granule of the
> + * lookup level where the guest fault happened exceeds vma_pagesize,
> + * which means new page tables will be created in the fault handlers.
> + */
> + if (fault_granule > vma_pagesize) {
> + ret = kvm_mmu_topup_memory_cache(memcache,
> + kvm_mmu_cache_min_pages(kvm));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
As I explained in v1 [1], this looks correct to me. I still think that someone
else should have a look, but if Marc decides to pick up this patch as-is, he can
add my Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2c65bff2-be7f-b20c-9265-939bc73185b6@arm.com/
Thanks,
Alex
> +
> /*
> * Under the premise of getting a FSC_PERM fault, we just need to relax
> * permissions only if vma_pagesize equals fault_granule. Otherwise,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-07 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-26 3:16 [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] KVM: arm64: Improve efficiency of stage2 page table Yanan Wang
2021-03-26 3:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] KVM: arm64: Move CMOs from user_mem_abort to the fault handlers Yanan Wang
2021-04-07 15:31 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-04-07 20:57 ` Will Deacon
2021-04-08 9:23 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-04-08 15:59 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-03-26 3:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: arm64: Distinguish cases of memcache allocations completely Yanan Wang
2021-04-07 15:35 ` Alexandru Elisei [this message]
2021-04-08 9:31 ` wangyanan (Y)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4348b555-2a38-6f00-8ef0-0d5fd801d753@arm.com \
--to=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®