From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
To: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: hamish.martin@alliedtelesis.co.nz, jannh@google.com,
pkalever@redhat.com, pkarampu@redhat.com, atumball@redhat.com,
sabose@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] uio: fix crash after the device is unregistered
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 09:47:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <434b1b7c-604d-a446-b73a-8de7a50817c5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5B3FBBF1.9080902@redhat.com>
On 2018/7/7 2:58, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 07/05/2018 09:57 PM, xiubli@redhat.com wrote:
>> void uio_event_notify(struct uio_info *info)
>> {
>> - struct uio_device *idev = info->uio_dev;
>> + struct uio_device *idev;
>> +
>> + if (!info)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + idev = info->uio_dev;
>>
> For this one too, I am not sure if it is needed.
>
> uio_interrupt -> uio_event_notify. See other mail.
>
> driver XYZ -> uio_event_notify. I think drivers need to handle this and
> set some bits and/or perform some cleanup to make sure they are not
> calling uio_event_notify after it has called uio_unregister_device. The
> problem with the above test is if they do not they could have called
> uio_unregister_device right after the info test so you could still hit
> the problem.
When we are tcmu_destroy_device(), if the netlink notify event to
userspace is not successful then the TCMU will call the uio unregister,
which will set the idev->info = NULL, without close and deleting the
device in userspace. But the TCMU could still queue cmds to the ring
buffer, then the uio_event_notify will be called.
For this case only when using idev->info it would happen. And currently
there is no need to check this, I will remove it for now.
Thanks,
BRs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-07 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-06 2:57 [PATCH v3 0/3] uio: fix potential crash bug xiubli
2018-07-06 2:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] uio: use request_threaded_irq instead xiubli
2018-07-06 2:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] uio: change to use the mutex lock instead of the spin lock xiubli
2018-07-06 3:39 ` Hamish Martin
2018-07-06 2:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] uio: fix crash after the device is unregistered xiubli
2018-07-06 3:40 ` Hamish Martin
2018-07-06 18:23 ` Mike Christie
2018-07-07 1:28 ` Xiubo Li
2018-07-09 17:06 ` Mike Christie
2018-07-10 2:40 ` Xiubo Li
2018-07-06 18:58 ` Mike Christie
2018-07-07 1:47 ` Xiubo Li [this message]
2018-07-09 16:40 ` Mike Christie
2018-07-10 2:36 ` Xiubo Li
2018-07-06 3:31 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] uio: fix potential crash bug Hamish Martin
2018-07-06 12:04 ` Xiubo Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=434b1b7c-604d-a446-b73a-8de7a50817c5@redhat.com \
--to=xiubli@redhat.com \
--cc=atumball@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hamish.martin@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchristi@redhat.com \
--cc=pkalever@redhat.com \
--cc=pkarampu@redhat.com \
--cc=sabose@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®