From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7BAC43603 for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 03:14:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75904206CB for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 03:14:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726750AbfLUDOk (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Dec 2019 22:14:40 -0500 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:11326 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726537AbfLUDOj (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Dec 2019 22:14:39 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Dec 2019 19:14:38 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,338,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="222611031" Received: from blu2-mobl3.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.239.195.247]) ([10.239.195.247]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Dec 2019 19:14:35 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Use 1st-level for IOVA translation To: "Liu, Yi L" , Joerg Roedel , David Woodhouse , Alex Williamson Cc: "Raj, Ashok" , "Kumar, Sanjay K" , "jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com" , "Tian, Kevin" , "Sun, Yi Y" , Peter Xu , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <20191219031634.15168-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> From: Lu Baolu Message-ID: <434d7478-1ed3-1962-ff9d-1b37d0c44b9c@linux.intel.com> Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 11:14:35 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi again, On 2019/12/20 19:50, Liu, Yi L wrote: > 3) Per VT-d spec, FLPT has canonical requirement to the input > addresses. So I'd suggest to add some enhance regards to it. > Please refer to chapter 3.6:-). > > 3.6 First-Level Translation > First-level translation restricts the input-address to a canonical address (i.e., address bits 63:N have > the same value as address bit [N-1], where N is 48-bits with 4-level paging and 57-bits with 5-level > paging). Requests subject to first-level translation by remapping hardware are subject to canonical > address checking as a pre-condition for first-level translation, and a violation is treated as a > translation-fault. It seems to be a conflict at bit 63. It should be the same as bit[N-1] according to the canonical address requirement; but it is also used as the XD control. Any thought? Best regards, baolu