From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030195AbVHKHYt (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 03:24:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030197AbVHKHYt (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 03:24:49 -0400 Received: from vsmtp1.tin.it ([212.216.176.141]:1477 "EHLO vsmtp1.tin.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030195AbVHKHYs (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 03:24:48 -0400 Message-ID: <4351.192.167.206.189.1123745081.squirrel@new.host.name> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:24:41 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Is it possible to control C.O.P From: "Luigi Genoni" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 [CVS] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org HI, there is a way that the kernel could cope with CPU Overheating Protection? I am usng a Tyan MPX with Dual AthlonMP, but COP is configured to shutdown the system toot early, when the temparature is still low. lm_sensors 2.9.0 didn't help Thanx in advance Luigi Genoni