Le 26.10.2005 23:20, Al Viro a écrit :
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:48:03PM +0200, Laurent riffard wrote:
> 
>>--- linux-2.6-stable.orig/drivers/ide/setup-pci.c
>>+++ linux-2.6-stable/drivers/ide/setup-pci.c
>>@@ -787,8 +787,9 @@
>> static LIST_HEAD(ide_pci_drivers);
>> 
>> /*
>>- *	ide_register_pci_driver		-	attach IDE driver
>>+ *	__ide_register_pci_driver	-	attach IDE driver
>>  *	@driver: pci driver
>>+ *	@module: owner module of the driver
>>  *
>>  *	Registers a driver with the IDE layer. The IDE layer arranges that
>>  *	boot time setup is done in the expected device order and then 
>>@@ -801,15 +802,16 @@
>>  *	Returns are the same as for pci_register_driver
>>  */
>> 
>>-int ide_pci_register_driver(struct pci_driver *driver)
>>+int __ide_pci_register_driver(struct pci_driver *driver, struct module *module)
>> {
>> 	if(!pre_init)
>>-		return pci_module_init(driver);
>>+		return __pci_register_driver(driver, module);
>>+	driver->driver.owner = module;
>> 	list_add_tail(&driver->node, &ide_pci_drivers);
>> 	return 0;
>> }
>> 
>>-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ide_pci_register_driver);
>>+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__ide_pci_register_driver);
> 
> 
> Not enough - you have to deal with pci_register_driver() call later in
> the same file.  Replace with __pci_register_driver(d, d->driver.owner)...

My bad, I should have have tried to check that...

Here is an updated patch, it includes your above remark and some
fixes related to .name deletion.

thanks
-- 
laurent