From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: paulmck@us.ibm.com, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
mingo@elte.hu, suzannew@cs.pdx.edu
Subject: Posix timers vs exec problems
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 17:32:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <436E1401.920A83EE@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051106010004.GB20178@us.ibm.com>
Roland, George, I think posix timers have problems with de_thread().
First, when non-leader thread does exec it calls release_task(->group_leader)
before calling exit_itimers(). This means that send_group_sigqueue() can oops
after taking tasklist_lock while doing spin_lock_irqsave(->sighand->siglock).
This is easy to fix.
cpu-timers have another problem. In !CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD() case we attach the
timer to ->signal->cpu_timers, so these timers (when created by another process)
will survive after exec. However they will continue to profile execed process
only if it was group_leader who did exec, otherwise posix_cpu_timer_schedule()
will notice that timer->it.cpu.task has ->signal == NULL and stop this timer.
So, should de_thread() call posix_cpu_timers_exit_group() after exit_itimers()
thus stoping cpu-timers after exec? Another option is to change ->it.cpu.task for
each timer in ->signal->cpu_timers, this way cpu-timers will continue to work.
But this is not trivial.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-06 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-05 1:36 [PATCH] Additional/catchup RCU signal fixes for -mm Paul E. McKenney
2005-11-05 16:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-11-06 1:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-11-06 14:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-11-06 14:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-11-06 23:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-11-06 14:32 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2005-11-07 18:12 ` [PATCH] fix de_thread() vs send_group_sigqueue() race Oleg Nesterov
2005-11-08 20:36 ` Chris Wright
2005-11-08 20:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-16 23:26 ` [PATCH] sigaction should clear all signals on SIG_IGN, not just < 32 George Anzinger
2005-11-22 1:09 ` Thread group exec race -> null pointer... HELP George Anzinger
2005-11-22 14:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-11-23 20:30 ` George Anzinger
2005-11-25 15:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-22 19:20 ` [PATCH] fix do_wait() vs exec() race Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=436E1401.920A83EE@tv-sign.ru \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=suzannew@cs.pdx.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®