mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: paulmck@us.ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	suzannew@cs.pdx.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixes for RCU handling of task_struct
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:28:01 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <436F9CB1.9F6BCC20@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <436F5402.137182CF@tv-sign.ru>

Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> 
> When group leader exits it goes into TASK_ZOMBIE state (if it is not the
> only one thread in the same group).

Just to clarify, single-thread process can go to TASK_ZOMBIE state too,
of course. But group leader can't be released (by itself or via sys_wait4)
while there are other threads in the same group.

> So, I think send_group_sigqueue() should do:
> 
>         read_lock(tasklist_lock);
> 
>         if (!tsk->signal) {
>                 // Can happen only if de_thread did release_task(tsk)
>                 // while switching to new leader.
>                 // We can't figure out the new leader, but it does not
>                 // matter - we should drop the signal anyway.
>                 unlock(tasklist);
>                 return;

No, I was wrong. This is not enough. This 'tsk' can be already freed!
sys_timer_create() bumps tsk->usage only when the signal is sent via
send_sigqueue(), it does not do get_task_struct(leader) when the signal
is not thread specific, but goes to the thread group.

Oleg.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-07 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-31  2:05 Paul E. McKenney
2005-10-31 14:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-31 14:08   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-01  4:51   ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-03 19:09     ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-11-04 17:41       ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-11-04 20:08         ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-11-05 16:32           ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-11-05 23:20             ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-11-06 12:01               ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-11-06 22:59                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-11-07 13:17                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-11-07 18:28                     ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2005-11-06 21:49   ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-06 22:43     ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-11-07  1:12     ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-07  4:58       ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-11-07  5:51         ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-07 18:10           ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=436F9CB1.9F6BCC20@tv-sign.ru \
    --to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=suzannew@cs.pdx.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome