Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 08:04:59AM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
>> wbsd_*_remove() is declared as __devexit but __devexit_p isn't used
>> when taking their addresses.
> 
> This patch has been generated assuming that your PNP suspend/resume
> patches are in... what do you want me to do with this?  Wait for
> the PNP patches to hit mainline, or...?
> 

Sorry about that. Improper patch ordering on my part. Here's one where 
it's applied before the suspend stuff.

Rgds
Pierre