From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932689AbVKIRTL (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:19:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932704AbVKIRTJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:19:09 -0500 Received: from public.id2-vpn.continvity.gns.novell.com ([195.33.99.129]:37969 "EHLO emea1-mh.id2.novell.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932696AbVKIRTG (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:19:06 -0500 Message-Id: <43723DD5.76F0.0078.0@novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0 Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:20:05 +0100 From: "Jan Beulich" To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/39] NLKD - an alternative kallsyms approach References: <43720DAE.76F0.0078.0@novell.com> <43720E2E.76F0.0078.0@novell.com> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >BTW, are you posting these just for comments or did you want >someone to apply/merge them? If so, who? You should send them >to that someone (unless you have some other arrangements) -- >at least that's the normal procedure. I don't expect the debugger itself to be merged, but I hope the preparatory pieces could be. And then, if not Andrew (who, as far as I can see, picks up things from the list just as much as stuff directly addressed to him), who would I send this to? There's doesn't seem to be a clear maintainer of i386, for example, and that seems to be the case for many other parts, too. Jan