From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
irogers@google.com, kan.liang@linux.intel.com,
peterz@infradead.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, james.clark@arm.com,
german.gomez@arm.com, leo.yan@linaro.org,
alexey.v.bayduraev@linux.intel.com,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sandipan.das@amd.com, ananth.narayan@amd.com,
santosh.shukla@amd.com, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/4] perf tool: Introduce PERF_RECORD_KMOD_SEC_MAP
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 19:04:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <437ccc68-e07f-de9a-4a0d-602b0d8189dd@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cbcb6109-0c23-9270-a534-c4fabdddfbbc@intel.com>
Hi Adrian,
On 16-Jan-23 11:44 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 10/01/23 07:58, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>> Introduce, perf tool only, synthetic event type PERF_RECORD_KMOD_SEC_MAP.
>> Also add stub code for it. This event will be used to save/restore kernel
>> module section maps to/from perf.data file. This is needed because kernel
>> module elfs does not contain program header table and thus there is no
>> easy way to find out how kernel would have loaded module sections in the
>> memory.
>
> Currently machine__addnew_module_map() adds a map for a
> module, and then perf_event__synthesize_modules() creates
> an MMAP/MMAP2 event for it. Why can't we do that for the
> sections?
Do you mean why not use MMAP/MMAP2 for module sections as well?
I thought about that but:
- PERF_RECORD_MMAP has no field which can help segregate normal vs section
specific maps.
- I can probably introduce special MAP_ flag and use PERF_RECORD_MMAP2. But
that flag will be non-standard (perf tool only), which is ugly.
- I also need additional hacks while synthesizing section specific MMAP/
MMAP2 (e.g.: store section name and file path in filename[]) and similar
hacks while parsing them at perf report time.
So I felt introducing PERF_RECORD_KMOD_SEC_MAP is relatively cleaner approach.
Thanks,
Ravi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-16 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-10 5:58 [RFC 0/4] perf tool: Fix non-".text" symbol resolution for kernel modules Ravi Bangoria
2023-01-10 5:58 ` [RFC 1/4] perf tool: Simplify machine__create_modules() a bit Ravi Bangoria
2023-01-10 5:58 ` [RFC 2/4] perf tool: Refactor perf_event__synthesize_modules() Ravi Bangoria
2023-01-10 5:58 ` [RFC 3/4] perf tool: Introduce PERF_RECORD_KMOD_SEC_MAP Ravi Bangoria
2023-01-16 6:14 ` Adrian Hunter
2023-01-16 13:34 ` Ravi Bangoria [this message]
2023-01-10 5:58 ` [RFC 4/4] perf tool: Fix non-".text" symbol resolution for kernel modules Ravi Bangoria
2023-02-07 7:35 ` kernel test robot
2023-01-10 6:35 ` [RFC 0/4] " Adrian Hunter
2023-01-10 8:43 ` Ravi Bangoria
2023-01-10 8:58 ` Ravi Bangoria
2023-01-16 4:21 ` Ravi Bangoria
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=437ccc68-e07f-de9a-4a0d-602b0d8189dd@amd.com \
--to=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.v.bayduraev@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
--cc=german.gomez@arm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®