mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] perf arm-spe: Support metadata version 2
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 09:32:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <437fed3a-2888-4fe0-9af7-5cee0204641f@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZvZSRNi_rVnrecPZ@google.com>



On 9/27/24 07:35, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 10:54:57PM +0100, Leo Yan wrote:
>> This commit is to support metadata version 2 and at the meantime it is
>> backward compatible for version 1's format.
>>
>> The metadata version 1 doesn't include the ARM_SPE_HEADER_VERSION field.
>> As version 1 is fixed with two u64 fields, by checking the metadata
>> size, it distinguishes the metadata is version 1 or version 2 (and any
>> new versions if later will have). For version 2, it reads out CPU number
>> and retrieves the metadata info for every CPU.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
>> index 70989b1bae47..17782cb40fb5 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
>> @@ -78,6 +78,10 @@ struct arm_spe {
>>
>>        unsigned long                   num_events;
>>        u8                              use_ctx_pkt_for_pid;
>> +
>> +     u64                             **metadata;
>> +     u64                             metadata_ver;
>> +     u64                             metadata_nr_cpu;
>>   };
>>
>>   struct arm_spe_queue {
>> @@ -1016,6 +1020,73 @@ static int arm_spe_flush(struct perf_session *session __maybe_unused,
>>        return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> +static u64 *arm_spe__alloc_per_cpu_metadata(u64 *buf, int cpu_size)
>> +{
>> +     u64 *metadata;
>> +
>> +     metadata = zalloc(sizeof(*metadata) * cpu_size);
> 
> Maybe calloc() is slightly better here, but not a strong opinion.

Ah, here 'cpu_size' is the size of per CPU's metadata in bytes. It
should not multiply sizeof(*metadata), though this will not lead buffer
overwrite issue as it allocates a bigger buffer than used.

I will rename the 'cpu_size' argument to 'per_cpu_size'.

>> +     if (!metadata)
>> +             return NULL;
>> +
>> +     memcpy(metadata, buf, cpu_size);
> 
> I'm not sure if it's correct since you allocated cpu_size * 8 and copies
> only cpu_size.

As described above, here it is correct as the unit of 'cpu_size' is in
bytes.

>> +     return metadata;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void arm_spe__free_metadata(u64 **metadata, int nr_cpu)
>> +{
>> +     int i;
>> +
>> +     for (i = 0; i < nr_cpu; i++)
>> +             zfree(&metadata[i]);
>> +     free(metadata);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u64 **arm_spe__alloc_metadata(struct perf_record_auxtrace_info *info,
>> +                                  u64 *ver, int *nr_cpu)
>> +{
>> +     u64 *ptr = (u64 *)info->priv;
>> +     u64 metadata_size;
>> +     u64 **metadata = NULL;
>> +     int hdr_sz, cpu_sz, i;
>> +
>> +     metadata_size = info->header.size -
>> +             sizeof(struct perf_record_auxtrace_info);
>> +
>> +     /* Metadata version 1 */
>> +     if (metadata_size == ARM_SPE_AUXTRACE_V1_PRIV_SIZE) {
>> +             *ver = 1;
>> +             *nr_cpu = 0;
>> +             /* No per CPU metadata */
>> +             return NULL;
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     *ver = ptr[ARM_SPE_HEADER_VERSION];
>> +     hdr_sz = ptr[ARM_SPE_HEADER_SIZE];
>> +     *nr_cpu = ptr[ARM_SPE_CPUS_NUM];
>> +
>> +     metadata = zalloc(sizeof(*metadata) * (*nr_cpu));
> 
> calloc() instead?  But probably better defining a struct for metadata.

I will change to calloc(). It allocates a pointer array, so I will
try to change to 'u64 *metadata[] = NULL;' for clear definition.

Thanks,
Leo

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-27  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-14 21:54 [PATCH v2 0/5] perf arm-spe: Introduce " Leo Yan
2024-09-14 21:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] perf arm-spe: Define metadata header " Leo Yan
2024-09-27  6:32   ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-27  8:05     ` Leo Yan
2024-09-14 21:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] perf arm-spe: Calculate meta data size Leo Yan
2024-09-27  6:14   ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-27  8:07     ` Leo Yan
2024-09-14 21:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] perf arm-spe: Save per CPU information in metadata Leo Yan
2024-09-27  6:21   ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-27  8:16     ` Leo Yan
2024-09-14 21:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] perf arm-spe: Support metadata version 2 Leo Yan
2024-09-27  6:35   ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-27  8:32     ` Leo Yan [this message]
2024-09-14 21:54 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] perf arm-spe: Dump metadata with " Leo Yan
2024-09-26 16:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] perf arm-spe: Introduce metadata " Leo Yan
2024-09-27  6:10   ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-27  8:41     ` Leo Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=437fed3a-2888-4fe0-9af7-5cee0204641f@arm.com \
    --to=leo.yan@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®