mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
	Jamie Iles <jamie@nuviainc.com>,
	D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	lcherian@marvell.com, bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com,
	tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/23] x86/resctrl: Abstract __rmid_read()
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:59:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <438e6316-3a42-7f96-44c4-528f905eb832@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <859c5573-b025-7754-94bf-294c7da3abdc@arm.com>

Hi James,

On 10/27/21 11:50 AM, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Reinette, Babu,
> 
> On 20/10/2021 21:28, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> On 10/20/2021 12:22 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>>> On 10/20/21 1:15 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>>>> On 10/19/2021 4:20 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>>>>> On 10/1/21 11:02 AM, James Morse wrote:
>>>>>> __rmid_read() selects the specified eventid and returns the counter
>>>>>> value from the msr. The error handling is architecture specific, and
>>>>>> handled by the callers, rdtgroup_mondata_show() and __mon_event_count().
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Error handling should be handled by architecture specific code, as
>>>>>> a different architecture may have different requirements. MPAM's
>>>>>> counters can report that they are 'not ready', requiring a second
>>>>>> read after a short delay. This should be hidden from resctrl.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Make __rmid_read() the architecture specific function for reading
>>>>>> a counter. Rename it resctrl_arch_rmid_read() and move the error
>>>>>> handling into it.
> 
> 
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
>>>>>> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
>>>>>> index 25baacd331e0..c8ca7184c6d9 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
>>>>>> @@ -579,9 +579,9 @@ int rdtgroup_mondata_show(struct seq_file *m, void
>>>>>> *arg)
>>>>>>          mon_event_read(&rr, r, d, rdtgrp, evtid, false);
>>>>>>    -    if (rr.val & RMID_VAL_ERROR)
>>>>>> +    if (rr.err == -EIO)
>>>>>>            seq_puts(m, "Error\n");
>>>>>> -    else if (rr.val & RMID_VAL_UNAVAIL)
>>>>>> +    else if (rr.err == -EINVAL)
>>>>>>            seq_puts(m, "Unavailable\n");
>>>>>>        else
>>>>>>            seq_printf(m, "%llu\n", rr.val * hw_res->mon_scale);
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch breaks the earlier fix
>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.kernel.org%2Fpub%2Fscm%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux.git%2Fcommit%2F%3Fh%3Dv5.15-rc6%26id%3D064855a69003c24bd6b473b367d364e418c57625&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cbabu.moger%40amd.com%7C00eaab44815947ce7eb908d99969e584%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637709502411367349%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=4udUc%2BEurWdC%2BAPQFs2eG0aVbsv3SnIXcEyRj081hxk%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 
> Aha!
> 
> 
>>>>> When the user reads the events on the default monitoring group with
>>>>> multiple subgroups, the events on all subgroups are consolidated
>>>>> together. In case if the last rmid read was resulted in error then whole
>>>>> group will be reported as error. The err field needs to be cleared.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please add this patch to clear the error.
> 
>>>> Good catch, thank you.
>>>>
>>>> Even so, I do not think mon_event_count()'s usage of __mon_event_count()
>>>> was taken into account by this patch and needs a bigger rework than the
>>>> above fixup. For example, if I understand correctly ret_val is the error
>>>> and rr->val no longer expected to contain the error after this patch. So
>>>> keeping that assignment to rr->val is not correct.
>>>
>>> Yes. You are right. rr->val is not expected to contain the error.
>>> Hopefully, this should help.
> 
>> Yes, this looks good. If the first __mon_event_count() succeeds but a following one fails
>> then the data still needs to be reported so the error code needs to be fixed up afterwards
>> and cannot be done inside __mon_event_count(). Thank you very much.
> 
> Thanks both! I should have worked this out when splitting msr_val into two values, which
> end up getting set the same.
> 
> I think the 'Unavailable' issue is subtle enough that it deserves a block comment.
> I've replaced the rr->val chunk with:
> |	/*
> |	 * __mon_event_count() calls for newly created monitor groups may
> |	 * report -EINVAL/Unavailable if the monitor hasn't seen any traffic.
> |	 * If the first call for the control group succeed, discard any error
> |	 * set by reads of monitor groups.
> |	 */
> |	if (ret_val == 0)
> |		rr->err = 0;

Looks good.
Thanks
Babu

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-27 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-01 16:02 [PATCH v2 00/23] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() return values in bytes James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 01/23] x86/resctrl: Free the ctrlval arrays when domain_setup_mon_state() fails James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 02/23] x86/resctrl: Fix kfree() of the wrong type in domain_add_cpu() James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 03/23] x86/resctrl: Kill off alloc_enabled James Morse
2021-10-15 22:19   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 04/23] x86/resctrl: Merge mon_capable and mon_enabled James Morse
2021-10-19 23:18   ` Babu Moger
2021-10-22 18:30     ` James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 05/23] x86/resctrl: Add domain online callback for resctrl work James Morse
2021-10-15 22:19   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-22 18:30     ` James Morse
2021-10-19 23:19   ` Babu Moger
2021-10-22 18:30     ` James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 06/23] x86/resctrl: Group struct rdt_hw_domain cleanup James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 07/23] x86/resctrl: Add domain offline callback for resctrl work James Morse
2021-10-19 23:19   ` Babu Moger
2021-10-22 18:30     ` James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 08/23] x86/resctrl: Create mba_sc configuration in the rdt_domain James Morse
2021-10-15 22:26   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-22 18:30     ` James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 09/23] x86/resctrl: Switch over to the resctrl mbps_val list James Morse
2021-10-15 22:26   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-27 16:49     ` James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 10/23] x86/resctrl: Remove architecture copy of mbps_val James Morse
2021-10-15 22:27   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-27 16:49     ` James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 11/23] x86/resctrl: Remove set_mba_sc()s control array re-initialisation James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 12/23] x86/resctrl: Abstract and use supports_mba_mbps() James Morse
2021-10-07  6:13   ` tan.shaopeng
2021-10-27 16:50     ` James Morse
2021-10-15 22:28   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 13/23] x86/resctrl: Allow update_mba_bw() to update controls directly James Morse
2021-10-15 22:28   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-27 16:49     ` James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 14/23] x86/resctrl: Calculate bandwidth from the previous __mon_event_count() chunks James Morse
2021-10-15 22:28   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-27 16:50     ` James Morse
2021-10-27 20:41       ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-29 15:50         ` James Morse
2021-10-29 22:22           ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 15/23] x86/recstrl: Add per-rmid arch private storage for overflow and chunks James Morse
2021-10-15 22:29   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 16/23] x86/recstrl: Allow per-rmid arch private storage to be reset James Morse
2021-10-07  6:16   ` tan.shaopeng
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 17/23] x86/resctrl: Abstract __rmid_read() James Morse
2021-10-15 22:29   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-19 23:20   ` Babu Moger
2021-10-20 18:15     ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-20 19:22       ` Babu Moger
2021-10-20 20:28         ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-27 16:50           ` James Morse
2021-10-27 18:59             ` Babu Moger [this message]
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 18/23] x86/resctrl: Pass the required parameters into resctrl_arch_rmid_read() James Morse
2021-10-15 22:30   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 19/23] x86/resctrl: Move mbm_overflow_count() " James Morse
2021-10-01 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 20/23] x86/resctrl: Move get_corrected_mbm_count() " James Morse
2021-10-01 16:03 ` [PATCH v2 21/23] x86/resctrl: Rename and change the units of resctrl_cqm_threshold James Morse
2021-10-01 16:03 ` [PATCH v2 22/23] x86/resctrl: Add resctrl_rmid_realloc_limit to abstract x86's boot_cpu_data James Morse
2021-10-01 16:03 ` [PATCH v2 23/23] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() return values in bytes James Morse
2021-10-13  2:09 ` [PATCH v2 00/23] " tan.shaopeng
2021-10-19 23:17 ` Babu Moger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=438e6316-3a42-7f96-44c4-528f905eb832@amd.com \
    --to=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jamie@nuviainc.com \
    --cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®