mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
To: sh_def@163.com,bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org,daniel@iogearbox.net,andrii@kernel.org,martin.lau@linux.dev,song@kernel.org,yonghong.song@linux.dev,john.fastabend@gmail.com,kpsingh@kernel.org,sdf@google.com,haoluo@google.com,jolsa@kernel.org,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,sh_def@163.com,sashiko-bot@kernel.org,ast@kernel.org,andrii@kernel.org,daniel@iogearbox.net,martin.lau@kernel.org,eddyz87@gmail.com,yonghong.song@linux.dev,clm@meta.com,ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix percpu map update indexing with sparse CPU IDs
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 13:48:22 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4399f187b740ad845694474891fa8063ec2fcfb4b3a6da4595e6b6dabfed5bb3@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260813120250.796934-4-sh_def@163.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2380 bytes --]

> commit 3563498ad027820b11bad3993a5c6a17d293ad23
> Author: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
>
>     bpf: fix percpu map update indexing with sparse CPU IDs
>
>     Per-CPU array, hash, and cgroup storage map updates without BPF_F_CPU
>     or BPF_F_ALL_CPUS use a value buffer whose per-CPU slots are packed in
>     possible-CPU order. The buffer is sized as:
>
>       round_up(value_size, 8) * num_possible_cpus()
>
>     The update paths iterate over possible CPUs, but use the logical CPU ID
>     to calculate the source offset:
>
>       value + size * cpu
>
>     This only works when possible CPU IDs are contiguous starting at zero.
>
>     For example, with a possible CPU mask of 0,2-3, the buffer contains
>     three slots corresponding to CPUs 0, 2, and 3. CPU2 is therefore
>     expected to use slot 1 and CPU3 slot 2. Instead, the current code uses
>     slots 2 and 3 respectively, causing incorrect per-CPU values and an
>     out-of-bounds read from the update buffer for CPU3.
>
>     The corresponding lookup paths already use a dense offset while
>     iterating over possible CPUs. Do the same for the array, hash, and
>     cgroup storage update paths, advancing the source offset once for each
>     possible CPU. BPF_F_ALL_CPUS continues to use the same value for every
>     CPU.
>
>     Fixes: 8eb76cb03f0f ("bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_array maps")

The Fixes: tag points to 8eb76cb03f0f, which introduced the 'value +
size * cpu' pattern in bpf_percpu_array_update() (kernel/bpf/arraymap.c).
That attribution is correct for the arraymap.c fix.

However, at commit 8eb76cb03f0f, kernel/bpf/hashtab.c and
kernel/bpf/local_storage.c still used the correct 'off += size' pattern
and did not have the 'size * cpu' bug yet. The hashtab.c and
local_storage.c bugs were introduced later in the same BPF_F_CPU feature
series.

Should this commit include additional Fixes: tags for the commits that
introduced the bug in hashtab.c and local_storage.c? This would ensure
that backporting tools pick up all three fixes even when the percpu_array
commit is not present in a given stable tree.


---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md

CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/31703563365

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-13 13:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-13 12:02 Hui Su
2026-08-13 13:48 ` bot+bpf-ci [this message]
2026-08-13 15:00 ` Leon Hwang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4399f187b740ad845694474891fa8063ec2fcfb4b3a6da4595e6b6dabfed5bb3@mail.kernel.org \
    --to=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@meta.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=sh_def@163.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®