mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IOMMU and scatterlist limits
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:41:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43A5E5A6.4050505@drzeus.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051117093848.GA7787@suse.de>

Revisiting a dear old thread. :)

After some initial tests, some more questions popped up. See below.

Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17 2005, Pierre Ossman wrote:
>   
>> Since there is no guarantee this will be mapped down to one segment
>> (that the hardware can accept), is it expected that the driver iterates
>> over the entire list or can I mark only the first segment as completed
>> and wait for the request to be reissued? (this is a MMC driver, which
>> behaves like the block layer)
>>     
>
> Ah MMC, that explains a few things :-)
>
> It's quite legal (and possible) to partially handle a given request, you
> are not obliged to handle a request as a single unit. See how other
> block drivers have an end request handling function ala:
>
>   

After testing this it seems the block layer never gives me more than
max_hw_segs segments. Is it being clever because I'm compiling for a
system without an IOMMU?

The hardware should (haven't properly tested this) be able to get new
DMA addresses during a transfer. In essence scatter gather with some CPU
support. Since I avoid MMC overhead this should give a nice performance
boost. But this relies on the block layer giving me more than one
segment. Do I need to lie in max_hw_segs to achieve this?

Rgds
Pierre


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-12-18 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-17  8:34 Pierre Ossman
2005-11-17  8:54 ` Jens Axboe
2005-11-17  9:02   ` Pierre Ossman
2005-11-17  9:13     ` Jens Axboe
2005-11-17  9:27       ` Pierre Ossman
2005-11-17  9:38         ` Jens Axboe
2005-11-17  9:49           ` Pierre Ossman
2005-11-17 12:02             ` Jens Axboe
2005-12-18 22:41           ` Pierre Ossman [this message]
2005-12-20 11:10             ` Tejun Heo
2005-12-20 11:36               ` Pierre Ossman
2005-12-20 12:04                 ` Tejun Heo
2005-12-20 12:28                   ` Pierre Ossman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43A5E5A6.4050505@drzeus.cx \
    --to=drzeus-list@drzeus.cx \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome