From: Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkdump-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [lkdump-develop] Re: [ANNOUNCE 0/7] Diskdump 1.0 Release
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:15:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43C4D67A05B46Dindou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1101732313.2814.63.camel@laptop.fenrus.org>
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:45:13 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>
>> I think kexec-dump is not stable yet.
>
>Do you have any facts to back this up? Is your project more stable ?
>What is the success rate of dumps of diskdump ? How does that compare to
>kexec-dump under the same circumstances ?
Sorry, a word "stable" was not appropriate. I meant that kexec-dump was
under development yet. kexec-dump works well on i386/x86_64, but it is
in the development stage on other architectures.
>> I heard that kexec-dump of
>> some architecture (ex. ia64) had some problems and not worked.
>
>wouldn't it be better to then help finish that rather than making an
>alternative ?
It is, if diskdump project just started now. But the basic code of
diskdump is almost completed. I think it is more efficient to enhance
quality of diskdump than help kexec-dump.
Best Regards,
Takao Indoh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-30 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-29 10:35 Takao Indoh
2004-11-29 10:37 ` [ANNOUNCE 1/7] " Takao Indoh
2004-11-30 3:23 ` Rusty Russell
2004-12-01 0:50 ` Takao Indoh
2004-11-29 10:39 ` [ANNOUNCE 2/7] " Takao Indoh
2004-11-29 10:41 ` [ANNOUNCE 3/7] " Takao Indoh
2004-11-30 3:24 ` Rusty Russell
2004-11-29 10:43 ` [ANNOUNCE 4/7] " Takao Indoh
2004-11-29 10:45 ` [ANNOUNCE 5/7] " Takao Indoh
2004-11-29 10:47 ` [ANNOUNCE 6/7] " Takao Indoh
2004-11-29 10:48 ` [ANNOUNCE 7/7] " Takao Indoh
2004-11-29 11:19 ` [ANNOUNCE 0/7] " Arjan van de Ven
2004-11-29 12:34 ` [lkdump-develop] " Takao Indoh
2004-11-29 12:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-11-30 1:15 ` Takao Indoh [this message]
2004-11-30 12:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-11-30 0:31 Itsuro Oda
2004-11-30 10:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2004-12-01 5:57 ` Itsuro Oda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43C4D67A05B46Dindou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkdump-develop@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®