Re: [PATCH 2/3] pidhash: don't use zero pids

[Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>]

Hello Oleg,

I had quite the same comment, but had no time to check it.
I can't understand what problem do you solve, or just making code 
cleaner (from your point of view)?
For me it was quite natural that pid=0 is used by idle, and I'm very 
suspicuos about such changes.

Kirill

> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> writes:
> 
>> daemonize() calls set_special_pids(1,1), while init and
>> kernel threads spawned from init/main.c:init() run with
>> 0,0 special pids. This patch changes INIT_SIGNALS() so
>> that that they run with ->pgrp == ->session == 1 also.
>>
>> This patch relies on fact that swapper's pid == 1.
>>
>> Now we never use pid == 0 in kernel/pid.c.
> 
> This changes what is visible to user space, for the case
> where we are not a member of a session of a process group.
> 
> By hashing the values these non-groups become available to
> user space.  Which I find disturbing.  Before I can comment
> further I need to see if there are any well defined semantics
> for processes that are not part of a session or a process
> group.  If there are well defined semantics we have just
> broken user space.
> 
> Eric
>