> There are actually more stable versions available but they are not advertised

["Igor Podlesny" <for.poige+linux@gmail.com>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8, Size: 1023 bytes --]

2008/12/29 Éric Piel <eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net>:> Igor Podlesny schreef:>> Actually that's either a mistake or I don't know what you guys call "a>> stable version".> [removing all the part which needs bug report numbers]>> I agree with you that the website is not very clear for someone not> accustomed to the Linux kernel development. There are actually more> stable versions available but they are not advertised. Maybe there> should be more trees displayed, something like this:> The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is:       2.6.28> The previous stable version of the Linux kernel is:     2.6.27.10> The latest longtime version of the Linux kernel is:     2.6.16.62
	Well, I'd call those versions stable if there were ongoing bugfixes(if affected) backporting to it. Otherwise these are rather "outdated"versions.
-- End of message. Next message?ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a­¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥