From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>,
Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Cc: "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK"
<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Add dynamic energy performance preference
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 12:13:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43daf20e-0d5b-4a1e-8179-bb2af39f512f@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59a20c51-aa1a-414d-97a6-610a82947472@kernel.org>
On 3/19/2025 11:50, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> On 3/18/2025 22:43, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
>> On 3/19/2025 1:06 AM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>> On 3/12/2025 07:16, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
>>>> On 3/4/2025 8:53 PM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>>>> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dynamic energy performance preference will change the EPP profile
>>>>> based on whether the machine is running on AC or DC power.
>>>>>
>>>>> A notification chain from the power supply core is used to adjust
>>>>> EPP values on plug in or plug out events.
>>>>>
>>>>> For non-server systems:
>>>>> * the default EPP for AC mode is `performance`.
>>>>> * the default EPP for DC mode is `balance_performance`.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> v1->v2:
>>>>> * Change defaults to performance (AC) and balance_performance (DC)
>>>>> * Default Kconfig to disabled for now
>>>>> * Rebase on latest branch
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst | 18 ++-
>>>>> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.x86 | 12 ++
>>>>> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 129 ++++++++++++++
>>>>> ++++--
>>>>> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.h | 5 +-
>>>>> 4 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>> [Snip]
>>>>> @@ -1556,6 +1667,10 @@ static int amd_pstate_epp_set_policy(struct
>>>>> cpufreq_policy *policy)
>>>>> if (!policy->cpuinfo.max_freq)
>>>>> return -ENODEV;
>>>>> + /* policy can't be changed to performance policy while
>>>>> dynamic epp is enabled */
>>>>> + if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE && cpudata-
>>>>> >dynamic_epp)
>>>>> + return -EBUSY;
>>>>
>>>> We might need to tweak this condition, because if we enable
>>>> "CONFIG_X86_AMD_PSTATE_DYNAMIC_EPP" in config
>>>> and boot with "amd_pstate=active" it lands here (cpufreq_online()-
>>>> >amd_pstate_epp_set_policy()) driver init fails
>>>> as the default governor is performance.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The check is important to make sure that you can't go to performance
>>> mode after init.
>>>
>>> I think this is the way I would want to solve it.
>>> Set policy to powersave before enabling dynamic epp for
>>> amd_pstate_epp_cpu_init().
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
>>> index 824756ac0010e..4a0f561d0e2d1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
>>> @@ -1729,8 +1729,10 @@ static int amd_pstate_epp_cpu_init(struct
>>> cpufreq_policy *policy)
>>> WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->cppc_req_cached, value);
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (dynamic_epp)
>>> + if (dynamic_epp) {
>>> + policy->policy = CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE;
>>> ret = amd_pstate_set_dynamic_epp(policy);
>>> + }
>>> else
>>> ret = amd_pstate_set_epp(policy,
>>> amd_pstate_get_balanced_epp(policy));
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^ (mentioned below)
>>> if (ret)
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Yes, this looks good, because anyway there is no point in having
>> performance governor and dynamic
>> epp set at the same time.
>>
>> I found one related quirk though, we are setting performance governor
>> for server platforms in
>> amd_pstate_epp_cpu_init() and then setting epp at the line highlighted
>> above. We dont have a
>> check in *_set_epp() functions for performance governor. This could
>> alter the performance governor
>> behavior if we set a "balanced" epp for it. I haven't tested this part
>> yet.
>
> In that case we probably want the "default" ACPI platform profile to be
> "performance" when on a server instead of balanced.
Actually this is already done:
cpudata->current_profile = PLATFORM_PROFILE_PERFORMANCE;
I'll post an updated patch series for you to test.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dhananjay
>>
>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> cpudata->policy = policy->policy;
>>>>> ret = amd_pstate_epp_update_limit(policy);
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.h b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-
>>>>> pstate.h
>>>>> index fbe1c08d3f061..6882876f895de 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.h
>>>>> @@ -104,7 +104,10 @@ struct amd_cpudata {
>>>>> /* EPP feature related attributes*/
>>>>> u32 policy;
>>>>> bool suspended;
>>>>> - u8 epp_default;
>>>>> + u8 epp_default_ac;
>>>>> + u8 epp_default_dc;
>>>>> + bool dynamic_epp;
>>>>> + struct notifier_block power_nb;
>>>>> };
>>>>> /*
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-19 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-04 15:23 [PATCH v2 0/5] amd-pstate Dynamic EPP and raw EPP Mario Limonciello
2025-03-04 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Add dynamic energy performance preference Mario Limonciello
2025-03-07 6:45 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-03-11 6:34 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-03-18 19:08 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-03-12 12:16 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-03-18 19:36 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-03-19 3:43 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-03-19 16:50 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-03-19 17:13 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2025-03-04 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] cpufreq/amd-pstate: add kernel command line to override dynamic epp Mario Limonciello
2025-03-07 8:53 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-03-04 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Add support for platform profile class Mario Limonciello
2025-03-07 16:22 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-03-07 16:55 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-03-08 4:30 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-03-10 5:09 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-03-18 19:07 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-03-04 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Add support for raw EPP writes Mario Limonciello
2025-03-04 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Add a unit test for raw EPP Mario Limonciello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43daf20e-0d5b-4a1e-8179-bb2af39f512f@amd.com \
--to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=superm1@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®