From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758934AbYHDWxJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 18:53:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752568AbYHDWvr (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 18:51:47 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.248]:16483 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751652AbYHDWvp (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2008 18:51:45 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=s4EZkJIN4xk/j8FVoxCyaRR49mCl6CTAkExm9jMr8/s8zl95Ym3tD008/Vq+O9Xm4e AJJWx6MGs0Chu2MLlsFYMa26yhRGTAFJ3NIvHRkJCTonhtY9ZXsAnygS2KvU5lFa6TBJ c2NXwLtf4phkMMa3XiKXi8AVbS/othztf1dbs= Message-ID: <43e72e890808041545y1b1727c1t90db35721a9c9d8d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 15:45:38 -0700 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: "Marcel Holtmann" Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04 Cc: "John W. Linville" , davem@davemloft.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1217889426.7819.26.camel@californication> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080804193753.GA30345@tuxdriver.com> <1217882288.7819.19.camel@californication> <20080804204558.GA5866@tuxdriver.com> <1217886123.7819.23.camel@californication> <20080804215439.GA9658@tuxdriver.com> <1217889426.7819.26.camel@californication> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi John, > >> > > > > Luis R. Rodriguez (4): >> > > > > list.h: Add list_splice_tail() and list_splice_tail_init() >> > > > > list.h: add list_cut_position() >> > > > >> > > > have these two changes got reviewed on LKML? I don't see any ACKs for it >> > > > in the commit message. >> > > >> > > Hmmm...no. I thought the original patches had been copied to >> > > linux-kernel, but it looks like that is not the case. >> > > >> > > The original patches are archived here: >> > > >> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783421908441&w=2 >> > > >> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783422008445&w=2 >> > > >> > > What problems do you see with them? >> > >> > I don't see a problem with these patches, but they should at least be >> > reviewed on LKML once. Changes to core kernel infrastructure should not >> > be merged silently via subsystem trees without any kind of ACKs. >> >> Yes, fine. That wasn't my intent. :-) The patches were originally >> posted about two weeks ago, too bad that didn't actually go to >> linux-kernel. :-( > > just post them to LKML (or let Luis do it) so they get reviewed. I > really don't see an issue with them, but that is only me. I'll repost those specific patches and add lkml. Luis