From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757315AbYIRXL1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:11:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755778AbYIRXK5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:10:57 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.228]:11034 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755623AbYIRXK4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:10:56 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Bz1Go4CUmr4ciu8O2ROcKJgWpSZlQtoUUAR/vKD3gcBZaFiEJrtUUX97P39kTxtpGY m9NdiUEMK/9NobLLtmMC952Wu37APrPPbkLa08D+iPVWQ3xextjDB8lRrU7GMeNP179m 4hdCRpL/6fGfvZ2obnwW2uLwKW2sqmgWqHO04= Message-ID: <43e72e890809181610h3a7729d8s4c8484d97b21932e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:10:52 -0700 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: "Steven Noonan" Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: massive unexplained latency in 2.6.27 (rc5, rc6, probably others) Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" , linux-wireless , LKML , "Luis Rodriguez" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <43e72e890809181134ybbec8fdxcb2a466aa17fe390@mail.gmail.com> <43e72e890809181142n7738cd99g522e6688e68d11ce@mail.gmail.com> <43e72e890809181344q416b5944w3332ee5a33db048c@mail.gmail.com> <20080918220102.GE7408@tesla> <43e72e890809181508w5232a14ewbf2bf18fe90a92d5@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: f4828fd4ced043f9 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Steven Noonan > I always get "1 megabit/sec". It actually measures (at best) to be a > throughput of 8mbits/sec, though the average (due to strange random > packet loss) is about 4mbits/sec. -- Yeah, iwconfig reports a wrong rate, should be easy to fix but I haven't yet looked at it. If you can fix it it'd be appreciated. > And that was with aggregation > re-enabled via your patch. That patch just fixes aggregation for mac80211 after the TX MQ changes, its seems ath9k aggregation is broken. Looking into that now. > Without, it never exceeds 1mbit/sec > (actual, not just as indicated by iwconfig. Right. Luis