From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752866Ab0ATXBk (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:01:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751645Ab0ATXBj (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:01:39 -0500 Received: from mail-pw0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:60516 "EHLO mail-pw0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751147Ab0ATXBi (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:01:38 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=RikAkgpvgssg7rn4F0WsL7BH+NmV0SE/2TRe0fKOpzX8GkB8jpjuQ0wxHsvrnErY2G 2zLaH25lTsstduML0wMujasUpdrE78WYDEx2USKpXPZUhihNKsLzndzSVQClgdRR/U/u iDVEG1tww3c1lAwjv0lEAvyS1WWLgMcrwtqok= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1264027973.5591.241.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1264017679-19324-1-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <1264019268.5591.223.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100120210813.GF10113@tux> <1264027973.5591.241.camel@localhost.localdomain> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:01:17 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9a70c3db960ed627 Message-ID: <43e72e891001201501n2088a40fn7d6ca2bef50c7c10@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Add DFU driver for Atheros Bluetooth chipset AR3011 To: Marcel Holtmann Cc: Luis Rodriguez , "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" , "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Vikram Kandukuri , SongXing Xu , David Miller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > As I said, if Dave is willing to take it, then I cherry-pick it for you > and include it with my next round of fixes. Well it enables hardware, so yes, I think it'd be good to add to 2.6.33-rc5, despite its historical issues on route upstream. Otherwise I have to poke distributions to carry the driver externally anyway, and I don't see the point in that if we still have a few RC cycles left and this driver is really small. Dave, please let me know if including this driver is unacceptable. I honestly fail to understand the reasons for it to not go into 2.6.33-rcX. Luis