Le 01.03.2006 11:06, Laurent Riffard a écrit :
> Le 01.03.2006 01:21, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> 
>>Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000034
>>
>>
>>I booted that thing on five machines, four architectures :(
>>
>>Could people please test a couple more patchsets, see if we can isolate it?
>>
>>http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/2.6.16-rc5-mm1.1.gz
>>
>>is 2.6.16-rc5-mm1 minus:
>>
>>proc-make-proc_numbuf-the-buffer-size-for-holding-a.patch
>>tref-implement-task-references.patch
>>proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely.patch
>>proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-git-nfs-fix.patch
>>proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix.patch
>>proc-optimize-proc_check_dentry_visible.patch
> 
> 
> Ok, 2.6.16-rc5-mm1.1 works for me:
> - I can run java from command line in runlevel 1
> - I can launch Mozilla in X
> 

Well, I should have check my logs... There is a bunch of BUGs  
when I launch Gnome:

BUG: warning at fs/inotify.c:533/inotify_d_instantiate()
 [<c0103c01>] show_trace+0xd/0xf
 [<c0103c18>] dump_stack+0x15/0x17
 [<c0165f52>] inotify_d_instantiate+0x2e/0x4e
 [<c015aa42>] d_splice_alias+0x6f/0x91
 [<e09ed0a6>] reiserfs_lookup+0xc8/0xd7 [reiserfs]
 [<c0152a8e>] do_lookup+0x9d/0x131
 [<c0153173>] __link_path_walk+0x651/0xa30
 [<c01535a0>] link_path_walk+0x4e/0xc6
 [<c01539e7>] do_path_lookup+0x196/0x1b0
 [<c0153e30>] __path_lookup_intent_open+0x44/0x76
 [<c0153ebe>] path_lookup_open+0x10/0x12
 [<c0154935>] open_namei+0x61/0x504
 [<c014743b>] do_filp_open+0x1f/0x35
 [<c0147535>] do_sys_open+0x3f/0xb7
 [<c01475d9>] sys_open+0x16/0x18
 [<c01029bb>] sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x75

I attached the (almost) full dmesg.

>>and http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/2.6.16-rc5-mm1.2.gz is
>>2.6.16-rc5-mm1 minus:
>>
>>trivial-cleanup-to-proc_check_chroot.patch
>>proc-fix-the-inode-number-on-proc-pid-fd.patch
>>proc-remove-useless-bkl-in-proc_pid_readlink.patch
>>proc-remove-unnecessary-and-misleading-assignments.patch
>>proc-simplify-the-ownership-rules-for-proc.patch
>>proc-replace-proc_inodetype-with-proc_inodefd.patch
>>proc-remove-bogus-proc_task_permission.patch
>>proc-kill-proc_mem_inode_operations.patch
>>proc-properly-filter-out-files-that-are-not-visible.patch
>>proc-fix-the-link-count-for-proc-pid-task.patch
>>proc-move-proc_maps_operations-into-task_mmuc.patch
>>dcache-add-helper-d_hash_and_lookup.patch
>>proc-rewrite-the-proc-dentry-flush-on-exit.patch
>>proc-close-the-race-of-a-process-dying-durning.patch
>>proc-refactor-reading-directories-of-tasks.patch
>>#
>>proc-make-proc_numbuf-the-buffer-size-for-holding-a.patch
>>tref-implement-task-references.patch
>>proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely.patch
>>proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-git-nfs-fix.patch
>>proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix.patch
>>proc-optimize-proc_check_dentry_visible.patch
>>
>>
>>Thanks.
> 
> I guess you don't need me to test 2.6.16-rc5-mm1.2 since 
> 2.6.16-rc5-mm1.1 is OK.
> 
> thanks

Finally I'm going to give it a try...
-- 
laurent