Re: [PATCH 2/5] power: supply: bd71828: Fix current direction

[Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>]

Thanks for the review(s) Andy.

On 10/08/2026 20:18, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 01:09:07PM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> 
>> Both the current and the average current registers contain same
>> 'direction' -bit to denote the direction of the current. The code
>> reading these registers incorrectly caches the direction read from the
>> first register, and uses it also for the second.
>>
>> Fix this by initializing the direction bit for both register reads.
> 
> ...
> 
>> static int bd71828_get_current_ds_adc(struct bd71828_power *pwr, int *curr, int
> 
>>   {
>>   	__be16 tmp_curr;
>>   	char *tmp = (char *)&tmp_curr;
>> -	int dir = 1;
>>   	int regs[] = { pwr->regs->ibat, pwr->regs->ibat_avg };
>>   	int *vals[] = { curr, curr_avg };
>>   	int ret, i;
> 
>> -	for (dir = 1, i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(regs); i++) {
>> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(regs); i++) {
> 
> 
> While at it
> 
> 	for (unsigned int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(regs); i++) {
> 
>> +		int dir = 1;
> 
> 
> ...and drop it from the top declaration.

Nope. I'm not a fan of introducing variables inside loop conditions. 
It's too easy for me to miss them. And, even if I liked the idea (and I 
don't), it is not a change related to the actual fix - and making it for 
this loop only would make the style inconsistent in this file.

Yours,
	-- Matti

-- 
Matti Vaittinen
Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors
Oulu Finland

~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~