mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] lib/stackdepot: Double DEPOT_POOLS_CAP if KASAN is enabled
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 18:30:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44140c34-e2bd-4f6e-892c-51469edc8dfb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+fCnZdWgAD1pu4yyjON0ph9ae1B6iaWas0CbET+MXLNNXt5Hg@mail.gmail.com>


On 8/8/24 12:12, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>> When a wide variety of workloads are run on a debug kernel with KASAN
>> enabled, the following warning may sometimes be printed.
>>
>>   [ 6818.650674] Stack depot reached limit capacity
>>   [ 6818.650730] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 272741 at lib/stackdepot.c:252 depot_alloc_stack+0x39e/0x3d0
>>     :
>>   [ 6818.650907] Call Trace:
>>   [ 6818.650909]  [<00047dd453d84b92>] depot_alloc_stack+0x3a2/0x3d0
>>   [ 6818.650916]  [<00047dd453d85254>] stack_depot_save_flags+0x4f4/0x5c0
>>   [ 6818.650920]  [<00047dd4535872c6>] kasan_save_stack+0x56/0x70
>>   [ 6818.650924]  [<00047dd453587328>] kasan_save_track+0x28/0x40
>>   [ 6818.650927]  [<00047dd45358a27a>] kasan_save_free_info+0x4a/0x70
>>   [ 6818.650930]  [<00047dd45358766a>] __kasan_slab_free+0x12a/0x1d0
>>   [ 6818.650933]  [<00047dd45350deb4>] kmem_cache_free+0x1b4/0x580
>>   [ 6818.650938]  [<00047dd452c520da>] __put_task_struct+0x24a/0x320
>>   [ 6818.650945]  [<00047dd452c6aee4>] delayed_put_task_struct+0x294/0x350
>>   [ 6818.650949]  [<00047dd452e9066a>] rcu_do_batch+0x6ea/0x2090
>>   [ 6818.650953]  [<00047dd452ea60f4>] rcu_core+0x474/0xa90
>>   [ 6818.650956]  [<00047dd452c780c0>] handle_softirqs+0x3c0/0xf90
>>   [ 6818.650960]  [<00047dd452c76fbe>] __irq_exit_rcu+0x35e/0x460
>>   [ 6818.650963]  [<00047dd452c79992>] irq_exit_rcu+0x22/0xb0
>>   [ 6818.650966]  [<00047dd454bd8128>] do_ext_irq+0xd8/0x120
>>   [ 6818.650972]  [<00047dd454c0ddd0>] ext_int_handler+0xb8/0xe8
>>   [ 6818.650979]  [<00047dd453589cf6>] kasan_check_range+0x236/0x2f0
>>   [ 6818.650982]  [<00047dd453378cf0>] filemap_get_pages+0x190/0xaa0
>>   [ 6818.650986]  [<00047dd453379940>] filemap_read+0x340/0xa70
>>   [ 6818.650989]  [<00047dd3d325d226>] xfs_file_buffered_read+0x2c6/0x400 [xfs]
>>   [ 6818.651431]  [<00047dd3d325dfe2>] xfs_file_read_iter+0x2c2/0x550 [xfs]
>>   [ 6818.651663]  [<00047dd45364710c>] vfs_read+0x64c/0x8c0
>>   [ 6818.651669]  [<00047dd453648ed8>] ksys_read+0x118/0x200
>>   [ 6818.651672]  [<00047dd452b6cf5a>] do_syscall+0x27a/0x380
>>   [ 6818.651676]  [<00047dd454bd7e74>] __do_syscall+0xf4/0x1a0
>>   [ 6818.651680]  [<00047dd454c0db58>] system_call+0x70/0x98
>>
>> With all the recent changes in stackdepot to support new KASAN features,
>> it is obvious that the current DEPOT_POOLS_CAP of 8192 may not be
>> enough when KASAN is enabled. Fix this stackdepot capability issue
>> by doubling DEPOT_POOLS_CAP if KASAN is enabled. With 4k pages, the
>> maximum stackdepot capacity is doubled to 256 MB with KASAN enabled.
> It is possible that the stack depot runs out of space due to a truly
> large number of unique stack traces, but I would first make sure that
> is indeed the case. The one thing to check would be to dump all the
> stack traces from the stack depot when it overflows, and check whether
> they make sense. There have been cases in the past, when e.g. the task
> context part of a stack trace from an interrupt didn't get stripped
> properly, and thus almost each stack trace from an interrupt was
> considered unique by the stack depot. Perhaps, something similar
> started happening again.

You are right. Indeed this problem is caused by mixing the task and 
interrupt stack traces and treating them as unique traces causing a lot 
more partially duplicated stack traces to be stored and thus overflowing 
the current stackdepot capacity.

This problem happens in a s390 machine and it looks like 
__irqentry_text_start and __irqentry_text_end aren't properly set up 
causing filter_irq_stacks() to fail in identifying the proper interrupt 
boundary.

It may be a defect in the s390 architectural code or something is wrong 
in the way the s390 kernel is being built. I am not proficient in the 
s390 arch. So I will ask our s390 experts to take a further look at this.

Thanks a lot for the helping me to figure this out. I am going to drop 
this patch.

Cheers,
Longman



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-08 22:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-08 12:54 Waiman Long
2024-08-08 16:12 ` Andrey Konovalov
2024-08-08 18:32   ` Waiman Long
2024-08-08 19:22     ` Andrey Konovalov
2024-08-08 19:25       ` Waiman Long
2024-08-08 22:30   ` Waiman Long [this message]
2024-08-08 21:52 ` Barry Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44140c34-e2bd-4f6e-892c-51469edc8dfb@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®