From: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
"Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: protect calculation of max_pull from integer wrap
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 12:21:42 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44273E26.5090203@bigpond.net.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1059 bytes --]
Problem:
As the comment above the calculation of max_pull in the function states,
there is a need to ensure that negative results of the subtractions do
not wrap around to large numbers. This has not been implemented for the
(max_load - busiest_load_per_task) expression and the possible
consequences are for undesirable movement of tasks from one group to
another group. E.g. consider a numa system with two nodes, each
node containing four processors. If there are two processes in node-0
and with node-1 being completely idle, one of those processes will be
moved to node-1 whereas the desired behavior is to retain those two
processes in node-0.
Fix:
Make sure that max_load is greater than busiest_load_per_task before
making the calculation. If it isn't max_pull will be zero and we skip
directly to out_balanced.
Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.com.au>
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
[-- Attachment #2: smpnice-protect-max_pull-calculation --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 633 bytes --]
Index: MM-2.6.X/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- MM-2.6.X.orig/kernel/sched.c 2006-03-27 11:07:52.000000000 +1100
+++ MM-2.6.X/kernel/sched.c 2006-03-27 12:08:47.000000000 +1100
@@ -2179,6 +2179,8 @@ find_busiest_group(struct sched_domain *
* by pulling tasks to us. Be careful of negative numbers as they'll
* appear as very large values with unsigned longs.
*/
+ if (max_load <= busiest_load_per_task)
+ goto out_balanced;
/* Don't want to pull so many tasks that a group would go idle */
max_pull = min(max_load - avg_load, max_load - busiest_load_per_task);
reply other threads:[~2006-03-27 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44273E26.5090203@bigpond.net.au \
--to=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®