mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
To: pankaj.gupta@oss.nxp.com, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@nxp.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v30 7/7] arm64: dts: imx8ulp-evk: add reserved memory property
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 15:26:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <442783be-aa7b-4e3e-a2e5-4604b342956f@kontron.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260724-imx-se-if-v30-7-ce8ba256692c@nxp.com>

On 24.07.26 11:05, pankaj.gupta@oss.nxp.com wrote:
> From: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@nxp.com>
> 
> Reserve 1MB of DDR memory region due to EdgeLock Enclave's hardware
> limitation restricting access to DDR addresses from 0x80000000
> to 0xafffffff.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@nxp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp-evk.dts | 12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp-evk.dts
> index 5dea66c1e7aa..16399d921e04 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp-evk.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp-evk.dts
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
>  /*
> - * Copyright 2021 NXP
> + * Copyright 2021, 2025 NXP
>   */
>  
>  /dts-v1/;
> @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ linux,cma {
>  			linux,cma-default;
>  		};
>  
> +		ele_reserved: memory@90000000 {
> +			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> +			reg = <0 0x90000000 0 0x100000>;

Instead of using a fixed address here, why not use 'alloc-ranges' to
specify a valid range and let the kernel decide on where to reserve the
1MB area?

As mentioned for the other patch, I would prefer a universal default for
the memory node in a dtsi that can be used by all imx8ulp boards. See
[1] for the i.MX93 proposal.

[1]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20260727-upstreaming-next-20260609-imx-ocotp-ele-v4-10-1a515de33093@kontron.de/

> +			no-map;
> +		};
> +
>  		m33_reserved: noncacheable-section@a8600000 {
>  			reg = <0 0xa8600000 0 0x1000000>;
>  			no-map;
> @@ -259,6 +265,10 @@ &usdhc0 {
>  	status = "okay";
>  };
>  
> +&hsm0 {
> +	memory-region = <&ele_reserved>;
> +};
> +
>  &fec {
>  	pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
>  	pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_enet>;
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-27 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-24  9:05 [PATCH v30 0/7] firmware: imx: driver for NXP secure-enclave pankaj.gupta
2026-07-24  9:05 ` [PATCH v30 1/7] Documentation/firmware: add imx/se to other_interfaces pankaj.gupta
2026-07-24  9:05 ` [PATCH v30 2/7] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add imx-se-fw binding doc pankaj.gupta
2026-07-24  9:05 ` [PATCH v30 3/7] firmware: imx: add driver for NXP EdgeLock Enclave pankaj.gupta
2026-07-24  9:05 ` [PATCH v30 4/7] firmware: imx: device context dedicated to priv pankaj.gupta
2026-07-24  9:05 ` [PATCH v30 5/7] firmware: drivers: imx: adds miscdev pankaj.gupta
2026-07-24  9:05 ` [PATCH v30 6/7] arm64: dts: imx8ulp: add secure enclave node pankaj.gupta
2026-07-27 13:21   ` Frieder Schrempf
2026-07-24  9:05 ` [PATCH v30 7/7] arm64: dts: imx8ulp-evk: add reserved memory property pankaj.gupta
2026-07-27 13:26   ` Frieder Schrempf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=442783be-aa7b-4e3e-a2e5-4604b342956f@kontron.de \
    --to=frieder.schrempf@kontron.de \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pankaj.gupta@nxp.com \
    --cc=pankaj.gupta@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®