mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
	"Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: improve stability of smpnice load balancing
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 09:29:25 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <442B0A45.90808@bigpond.net.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 728 bytes --]

Problem:

Due to an injudicious piece of code near the end of find_busiest_group() 
smpnice load balancing is too aggressive resulting in excessive movement 
of tasks from one CPU to another.

Solution:

Remove the offending code.  The thinking that caused it to be included 
became invalid when find_busiest_queue() was modified to use average 
load per task (on the relevant run queue) instead of SCHED_LOAD_SCALE 
when evaluating small imbalance values to see whether they warranted 
being moved.

Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.com.au>

Peter
-- 
Peter Williams                                   pwil3058@bigpond.net.au

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
  -- Ambrose Bierce

[-- Attachment #2: smpnice-increase-stability --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 704 bytes --]

Index: MM-2.6.X/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- MM-2.6.X.orig/kernel/sched.c	2006-03-29 16:18:37.000000000 +1100
+++ MM-2.6.X/kernel/sched.c	2006-03-29 16:20:37.000000000 +1100
@@ -2290,13 +2290,10 @@ find_busiest_group(struct sched_domain *
 		pwr_move /= SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
 
 		/* Move if we gain throughput */
-		if (pwr_move > pwr_now)
-			*imbalance = busiest_load_per_task;
-		/* or if there's a reasonable chance that *imbalance is big
-		 * enough to cause a move
-		 */
-		 else if (*imbalance <= busiest_load_per_task / 2)
+		if (pwr_move <= pwr_now)
 			goto out_balanced;
+
+		*imbalance = busiest_load_per_task;
 	}
 
 	return busiest;

                 reply	other threads:[~2006-03-29 22:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=442B0A45.90808@bigpond.net.au \
    --to=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome