From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: DooHyun Hwang <dh0421.hwang@samsung.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
alim.akhtar@samsung.com, avri.altman@wdc.com,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, peter.wang@mediatek.com,
manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, quic_mnaresh@quicinc.com
Cc: grant.jung@samsung.com, jt77.jang@samsung.com,
junwoo80.lee@samsung.com, jangsub.yi@samsung.com,
sh043.lee@samsung.com, cw9316.lee@samsung.com,
sh8267.baek@samsung.com, wkon.kim@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: increase the NOP_OUT command timeout
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 10:12:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44520a93-a52e-4f88-8ca5-5f0fb38df607@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250115022344.3967-1-dh0421.hwang@samsung.com>
On 1/14/25 6:23 PM, DooHyun Hwang wrote:
> It is found that is UFS device may take longer than 500ms(50ms * 10times)
> to respond to NOP_OUT command.
>
> The NOP_OUT command timeout was total 500ms that is from
> a timeout value of 50ms(defined by NOP_OUT_TIMEOUT)
> with 10 retries(defined by NOP_OUT_RETRIES)
>
> This change increase the NOP_OUT command timeout to total 1000ms
> by changing timeout value to 100ms(NOP_OUT_TIMEOUT)
>
> Signed-off-by: DooHyun Hwang <dh0421.hwang@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> index cd404ade48dc..bf5c4620ef6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> @@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ enum {
> };
> /* NOP OUT retries waiting for NOP IN response */
> #define NOP_OUT_RETRIES 10
> -/* Timeout after 50 msecs if NOP OUT hangs without response */
> -#define NOP_OUT_TIMEOUT 50 /* msecs */
> +/* Timeout after 100 msecs if NOP OUT hangs without response */
> +#define NOP_OUT_TIMEOUT 100 /* msecs */
>
> /* Query request retries */
> #define QUERY_REQ_RETRIES 3
The above change relies on all device management commands being issued
with the same tag. If a single NOP OUT command may take longer than
500 ms, shouldn't NOP_OUT_TIMEOUT be increased to 1000 ms instead of
100 ms? The number of NOP OUT retries seems high to me and probably can
be reduced?
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-15 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250115022348epcas1p29705c109f51c01e1e91ef227233c7119@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2025-01-15 2:23 ` DooHyun Hwang
2025-01-15 18:12 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2025-01-16 2:02 ` DooHyun Hwang(황두현/Device S/W Solution Lab.(MX)/삼성전자)
2025-01-16 14:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-01-16 8:38 ` Avri Altman
2025-01-16 9:59 ` DooHyun Hwang
2025-01-16 16:30 ` Bao D. Nguyen
2025-01-24 6:16 ` DooHyun Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44520a93-a52e-4f88-8ca5-5f0fb38df607@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=cw9316.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=dh0421.hwang@samsung.com \
--cc=grant.jung@samsung.com \
--cc=jangsub.yi@samsung.com \
--cc=jt77.jang@samsung.com \
--cc=junwoo80.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=quic_mnaresh@quicinc.com \
--cc=sh043.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=sh8267.baek@samsung.com \
--cc=wkon.kim@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®