Hi, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Saturday 29 April 2006 23:00, Matthieu CASTET wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Le Sat, 29 Apr 2006 20:30:10 +0200, Mikael Pettersson a écrit : >> >> >> >>>Is there a better way to do this? ACPI? >>> >> >>Yes, I believe using PNP layer (that use ACPI with pnpacpi) with PNP0800 >>will be cleaner. > > > Please do a patch then. > Is something like that is acceptable ? Matthieu Signed-off-by: Matthieu CASTET