mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Panagiotis Issaris <takis@lumumba.uhasselt.be>
To: John Richard Moser <nigelenki@comcast.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Stealing ur megahurts (no, really)
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 13:02:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <446DA5B0.8020703@lumumba.uhasselt.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <446D61EE.4010900@comcast.net>

Hi,

John Richard Moser wrote:

>[...]
>Scrambling for an old machine is ridiculous.  Down-clocking makes sense
>because you can adjust to varied levels; but it's difficult and usually
>infeasible.  Pulling memory and mix and matching is not much better.
>
>On Linux we have mem= to toy with memory, which I personally HAVE used
>to evaluate how various distributions and releases of GNOME operate
>under memory pressure.  This is a lot more convenient than pulling chips
>and trying to find the right combination.  This option was, apparently,
>designed for situations where actual system memory capacity is
>mis-detected (mandrake 7.2 and its insistence that a 256M memory stick
>is 255M....); but is very useful in this application too.
>[...]
>  
>
An easier way might be to use a system emulator like Qemu.
You can specify the amount of memory the emulated system has,
and if you do not use the kernel accelerating module (kqemu)
it slows down considerably.

Of course, it would be nicer if you could actually specify performance
levels and an issue with this approach is that it does not uniformly
scale down performance: I think IO emulation performance is a lot worse
then CPU emulation performance (in Qemu).

With friendly regards,
Takis


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-05-19 11:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-19  6:13 John Richard Moser
2006-05-19 10:10 ` Matti Aarnio
2006-05-19 15:40   ` Joel Jaeggli
2006-05-20 18:35     ` Antonio Vargas
2006-05-19 17:21   ` John Richard Moser
2006-05-19 11:02 ` Panagiotis Issaris [this message]
2006-05-19 15:06   ` Lexington Luthor
2006-05-19 17:22   ` John Richard Moser
2006-05-19 11:22 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2006-05-19 11:43   ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-05-19 17:23   ` John Richard Moser
2006-05-19 17:37     ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2006-05-19 17:56       ` David Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=446DA5B0.8020703@lumumba.uhasselt.be \
    --to=takis@lumumba.uhasselt.be \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nigelenki@comcast.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®