From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751871AbWFLLSn (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:18:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751872AbWFLLSn (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:18:43 -0400 Received: from public.id2-vpn.continvity.gns.novell.com ([195.33.99.129]:24861 "EHLO emea1-mh.id2.novell.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751871AbWFLLSn (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:18:43 -0400 Message-Id: <448D69BF.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.1 Beta Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:18:55 +0200 From: "Jan Beulich" To: "Andi Kleen" Cc: , Subject: Re: [discuss] x86_64: x86-64 mailing lists / posting patchkits / x86-64 releases References: <200606121307.54556.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <200606121307.54556.ak@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >We still have a patches@x86-64 mailing list on x86-64.org which >is mostly unused. If I moved the big patch floods over there, >would the people who do reviews subscribe there? Please comment. I certainly would subscribe there if you want to split things. Depending on your intentions, I could also switch to send patches there. But if I'm asked about my preferences, I'd rather see things stay on the discuss list (as sending patches is generally meant to trigger discussion if need be). Jan