From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753009AbeBSQXH (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2018 11:23:07 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:53910 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752670AbeBSQXG (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2018 11:23:06 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix {pmd,pud}_{set,clear}_flags() To: Jan Beulich , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Boris Ostrovsky , lkml References: <5A8AF1BB02000078001A91C3@suse.com> From: Juergen Gross Message-ID: <44911e30-7d7a-14fd-1a70-ae3d92bfc771@suse.com> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:23:02 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5A8AF1BB02000078001A91C3@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 19/02/18 15:48, Jan Beulich wrote: > Just like pte_{set,clear}_flags() their PMD and PUD counterparts should > not do any address translation. This was outright wrong under Xen > (causing a dead boot with no useful output on "suitable" systems), and > produced needlessly more complicated code (even if just slightly) when > paravirt was enabled. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org While the changes look alright I'm really curious which kind of failure you are seeing, especially considering how long those functions haven't been changed (since more than 6 years). Juergen