From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751456AbWFUKWG (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2006 06:22:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751478AbWFUKWG (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2006 06:22:06 -0400 Received: from hp3.statik.TU-Cottbus.De ([141.43.120.68]:36315 "EHLO hp3.statik.tu-cottbus.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751456AbWFUKWD (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2006 06:22:03 -0400 Message-ID: <44991787.7010602@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:55:19 +0200 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Anderson-Lee CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] suggestion [PATCH N/M] subject lines References: <000001c694bb$f9fa3f40$ce2a2080@eecs.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <000001c694bb$f9fa3f40$ce2a2080@eecs.berkeley.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Anderson-Lee wrote: > Reading the mailing list with a non-threads compatible > mail client agent would be made much easier if the > convention for subject lines for multi-part patches was > changed to the following: > > patch set name [PATCH N/M] patch summary > > Then sorting by subject would group all patches for the > Same patch set together. A workaround is to sort by (1.) author + (2.) date. Should help in many cases. > I don't know if these Subject lines are hand generated, or if there > is software involved that would have to me modified for generating > and/or parsing them. All of it is true. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-==- -==- =-=-= http://arcgraph.de/sr/