Re: [PATCH resubmit net 1/2] net: fec: Forward-declare `fec_ptp_read()`

["Csókás Bence" <csokas.bence@prolan.hu>]

On 8/8/24 11:41, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 03:53:17PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 10:29:17AM +0200, Csókás, Bence wrote:
>>> This function is used in `fec_ptp_enable_pps()` through
>>> struct cyclecounter read(). Forward declarations make
>>> it clearer, what's happening.
>>
>> In general, forward declarations are not liked. It is better to move
>> the code to before it is used.
>>
>> Since this is a minimal fix for stable, lets allow it. But please wait
>> for net to be merged into net-next, and submit a cleanup patch which
>> does move fec_ptp_read() earlier and remove the forward declaration.
> 
> That makes sense.
> 
> However, is this a fix?
> It's not clear to me that it is.

Well, it's not clear to me either what constitutes as a "fix" versus 
"just a cleanup". But, whatever floats Andrew's boat...

> And if it is a pre-requisite for patch 2/2,
> well that doesn't seem to be a fix.

It indeed is.

> So in all, I'm somewhat confused.
> And wonder if all changes can go via net-next.

That's probably what will be happening.

Bence